https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_5043/shard-apl6/igt@kms_content_protection@atomic.html Starting subtest: atomic (kms_content_protection:4945) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function test_cp_enable_with_retry, file ../tests/kms_content_protection.c:219: (kms_content_protection:4945) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: ret (kms_content_protection:4945) CRITICAL: Content Protection not enabled <3> [1591.116749] [drm:intel_hdcp_auth [i915]] *ERROR* Timed out waiting for R0 ready
The CI Bug Log issue associated to this bug has been updated. ### New filters associated * APL: igt@kms_content_protection@atomic - dmesg-fail - *ERROR* Timed out waiting for R0 ready - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_5043/shard-apl6/igt@kms_content_protection@atomic.html
Bug assessment: this issue has been seen 2 times in 1170 runs at this time. Assuming that there were 300 runs between the 2 failures we'll probably need to wait for 3000 runs without failures before closing this issue (following the 10x rule). I will reduce the priority to medium. Also there seems to be a failure with an identical signature on SKL (bug 110668), so it appears that at the minimum these two issues should be combined into one. Further, this test continues to fail 100% on APL and SKL as can be seen here: http://gfx-ci.fi.intel.com/tree/drm-tip/igt@kms_content_protection@atomic.html But this failure has a different signature. Also I cannot find any filter corresponding to this 100% failure signature.
(In reply to ashutosh.dixit from comment #2) > Bug assessment: this issue has been seen 2 times in 1170 runs at this time. > Assuming that there were 300 runs between the 2 failures we'll probably need > to wait for 3000 runs without failures before closing this issue (following > the 10x rule). I will reduce the priority to medium. > > Also there seems to be a failure with an identical signature on SKL (bug > 110668), so it appears that at the minimum these two issues should be > combined into one. > > Further, this test continues to fail 100% on APL and SKL as can be seen here: > > http://gfx-ci.fi.intel.com/tree/drm-tip/igt@kms_content_protection@atomic. > html > > But this failure has a different signature. Also I cannot find any filter > corresponding to this 100% failure signature. Yes, this issue occurred twice on IGT_5043_full (4 months, 3 weeks old) and CI_DRM_6465_full (3 months, 2 weeks old). I would close this issue as WORKSFORME. Please reopen if this issue happens again.
The CI Bug Log issue associated to this bug has been archived. New failures matching the above filters will not be associated to this bug anymore.
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.