Bug 110889 - [CI][SHARDS] igt@kms_content_protection@atomic - dmesg-fail - *ERROR* Timed out waiting for R0 ready
Summary: [CI][SHARDS] igt@kms_content_protection@atomic - dmesg-fail - *ERROR* Timed o...
Status: RESOLVED WORKSFORME
Alias: None
Product: DRI
Classification: Unclassified
Component: DRM/Intel (show other bugs)
Version: DRI git
Hardware: Other All
: medium normal
Assignee: Intel GFX Bugs mailing list
QA Contact: Intel GFX Bugs mailing list
URL:
Whiteboard: ReadyForDev
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2019-06-11 07:47 UTC by Martin Peres
Modified: 2019-10-30 12:17 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
i915 platform: BXT
i915 features: display/HDCP


Attachments

Description Martin Peres 2019-06-11 07:47:26 UTC
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_5043/shard-apl6/igt@kms_content_protection@atomic.html

Starting subtest: atomic
(kms_content_protection:4945) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function test_cp_enable_with_retry, file ../tests/kms_content_protection.c:219:
(kms_content_protection:4945) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: ret
(kms_content_protection:4945) CRITICAL: Content Protection not enabled

<3> [1591.116749] [drm:intel_hdcp_auth [i915]] *ERROR* Timed out waiting for R0 ready
Comment 1 CI Bug Log 2019-06-11 07:48:06 UTC
The CI Bug Log issue associated to this bug has been updated.

### New filters associated

* APL: igt@kms_content_protection@atomic - dmesg-fail - *ERROR* Timed out waiting for R0 ready
  - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_5043/shard-apl6/igt@kms_content_protection@atomic.html
Comment 2 ashutosh.dixit 2019-10-29 21:29:09 UTC
Bug assessment: this issue has been seen 2 times in 1170 runs at this time. Assuming that there were 300 runs between the 2 failures we'll probably need to wait for 3000 runs without failures before closing this issue (following the 10x rule). I will reduce the priority to medium.

Also there seems to be a failure with an identical signature on SKL (bug 110668), so it appears that at the minimum these two issues should be combined into one.

Further, this test continues to fail 100% on APL and SKL as can be seen here:

http://gfx-ci.fi.intel.com/tree/drm-tip/igt@kms_content_protection@atomic.html

But this failure has a different signature. Also I cannot find any filter corresponding to this 100% failure signature.
Comment 3 Lakshmi 2019-10-30 12:17:26 UTC
(In reply to ashutosh.dixit from comment #2)
> Bug assessment: this issue has been seen 2 times in 1170 runs at this time.
> Assuming that there were 300 runs between the 2 failures we'll probably need
> to wait for 3000 runs without failures before closing this issue (following
> the 10x rule). I will reduce the priority to medium.
> 
> Also there seems to be a failure with an identical signature on SKL (bug
> 110668), so it appears that at the minimum these two issues should be
> combined into one.
> 
> Further, this test continues to fail 100% on APL and SKL as can be seen here:
> 
> http://gfx-ci.fi.intel.com/tree/drm-tip/igt@kms_content_protection@atomic.
> html
> 
> But this failure has a different signature. Also I cannot find any filter
> corresponding to this 100% failure signature.

Yes, this issue occurred twice on IGT_5043_full (4 months, 3 weeks old) and CI_DRM_6465_full (3 months, 2 weeks old).

I would close this issue as WORKSFORME. Please reopen if this issue happens again.
Comment 4 CI Bug Log 2019-10-30 12:17:43 UTC
The CI Bug Log issue associated to this bug has been archived.

New failures matching the above filters will not be associated to this bug anymore.


Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.