Bug 110909 - [CI][DRMTIP] igt@gem_vm_create@isolation - fail - Failed assertion: result == 1, error: 0 != 1
Summary: [CI][DRMTIP] igt@gem_vm_create@isolation - fail - Failed assertion: result ==...
Status: RESOLVED MOVED
Alias: None
Product: DRI
Classification: Unclassified
Component: DRM/Intel (show other bugs)
Version: DRI git
Hardware: Other All
: medium normal
Assignee: Intel GFX Bugs mailing list
QA Contact: Intel GFX Bugs mailing list
URL:
Whiteboard: ReadyForDev
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2019-06-13 05:25 UTC by Lakshmi
Modified: 2019-11-29 19:09 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
i915 platform: BXT, BYT
i915 features: GEM/Other


Attachments

Description Lakshmi 2019-06-13 05:25:44 UTC
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_305/fi-byt-j1900/igt@gem_vm_create@isolation.html

Starting subtest: isolation
(gem_vm_create:1133) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function isolation, file ../tests/i915/gem_vm_create.c:329:
(gem_vm_create:1133) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: result == 1
(gem_vm_create:1133) CRITICAL: error: 0 != 1
Subtest isolation failed.
**** DEBUG ****
(gem_vm_create:1133) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function isolation, file ../tests/i915/gem_vm_create.c:329:
(gem_vm_create:1133) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: result == 1
(gem_vm_create:1133) CRITICAL: error: 0 != 1
(gem_vm_create:1133) igt_core-INFO: Stack trace:
(gem_vm_create:1133) igt_core-INFO:   #0 ../lib/igt_core.c:1514 __igt_fail_assert()
(gem_vm_create:1133) igt_core-INFO:   #1 ../tests/i915/gem_vm_create.c:166 __real_main375()
(gem_vm_create:1133) igt_core-INFO:   #2 [<unknown>+0x0]
****  END  ****
Subtest isolation: FAIL (0.024s)
Comment 1 CI Bug Log 2019-06-13 05:27:51 UTC
The CI Bug Log issue associated to this bug has been updated.

### New filters associated

* BYT: igt@gem_vm_create@isolation - fail - Failed assertion: result == 1, error: 0 != 1
  - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_305/fi-byt-j1900/igt@gem_vm_create@isolation.html
Comment 2 Chris Wilson 2019-06-13 06:11:56 UTC
Another case where I shouldn't have used gem_read() because we are lying to the kernel about write hazards, I think.
Comment 3 Francesco Balestrieri 2019-07-30 04:28:55 UTC
> Another case where I shouldn't have used gem_read() because we are lying to 
> the kernel about write hazards, I think.

Was there a fix? It hasn't happened again, although there have only been a few runs.
Comment 4 Chris Wilson 2019-08-03 11:11:52 UTC
Nope, I haven't sent a patch for this yet. It will just take a perfect storm to detect.
Comment 5 CI Bug Log 2019-11-20 07:15:54 UTC
A CI Bug Log filter associated to this bug has been updated:

{- BYT: igt@gem_vm_create@isolation - fail - Failed assertion: result == 1, error: 0 != 1 -}
{+ APL BYT: igt@gem_vm_create@isolation - fail - Failed assertion: result == 1, error: 0 != 1 +}

New failures caught by the filter:

  * https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7373/shard-apl4/igt@gem_vm_create@isolation.html
Comment 6 Martin Peres 2019-11-29 19:09:55 UTC
-- GitLab Migration Automatic Message --

This bug has been migrated to freedesktop.org's GitLab instance and has been closed from further activity.

You can subscribe and participate further through the new bug through this link to our GitLab instance: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/314.


Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.