In 19.20-812932 release for Ubuntu there appeared packages roct-amdgpu-pro and roct-amdgpu-pro-dev. They have a MIT license, but contains -pro suffix. Is there any specific intention to do so? I thought that only proprietary packages should have that suffix. Also there are packages: amf-amdgpu-pro opencl-amdgpu-pro-comgr opencl-amdgpu-pro-dev opencl-amdgpu-pro-hip What about their suffixes?
Ubuntu packaging issue; this needs to be reported to Ubuntu instead.
TIL AMD does its support via our bugzilla...
The pro suffix denotes that it's a part of the PRO stack, not propriety (yes misleading name, I know). "PRO" does not mean it's closed source, though most of the PRO stack is closed. ROCT for example is MIT as it's borrowed from ROCm. As for the rest: -AMF is closed source AFAIK -opencl is closed source; this will be migrated to ROCm (MIT), but this is low priority since ROCm is already completely packaged elsewhere. We might strip the -pro from roct when we switch to ROCm, but I don't believe there's a plan set in stone right now. Closing as invalid for now.
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.