https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6647/shard-iclb4/igt@gem_ctx_shared@exec-single-timeline-bsd2.html Starting subtest: exec-single-timeline-bsd2 (gem_ctx_shared:1260) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function exec_single_timeline, file ../tests/i915/gem_ctx_shared.c:394: (gem_ctx_shared:1260) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: nop_sync(i915, ctx, engine, (1000*(1000*(1000)))) == 0 (gem_ctx_shared:1260) CRITICAL: error: -62 != 0 Subtest exec-single-timeline-bsd2 failed. **** DEBUG **** (gem_ctx_shared:1260) DEBUG: Test requirement passed: gem_ring_has_physical_engine(i915, engine) (gem_ctx_shared:1260) DEBUG: Test requirement passed: has_single_timeline(i915) (gem_ctx_shared:1260) igt_dummyload-DEBUG: Test requirement passed: nengine (gem_ctx_shared:1260) DEBUG: Test requirement passed: spin (gem_ctx_shared:1260) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function exec_single_timeline, file ../tests/i915/gem_ctx_shared.c:394: (gem_ctx_shared:1260) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: nop_sync(i915, ctx, engine, (1000*(1000*(1000)))) == 0 (gem_ctx_shared:1260) CRITICAL: error: -62 != 0 (gem_ctx_shared:1260) igt_core-INFO: Stack trace: (gem_ctx_shared:1260) igt_core-INFO: #0 ../lib/igt_core.c:1674 __igt_fail_assert() (gem_ctx_shared:1260) igt_core-INFO: #1 ../tests/i915/gem_ctx_shared.c:382 __real_main787() (gem_ctx_shared:1260) igt_core-INFO: #2 [<unknown>+0x0] **** END **** Subtest exec-single-timeline-bsd2: FAIL (1.056s)
The CI Bug Log issue associated to this bug has been updated. ### New filters associated * ICL: igt@gem_ctx_shared@exec-single-timeline-bsd2 - fail - Failed assertion: nop_sync(i915, ctx, engine, (1000*(1000*(1000)))) == 0 - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Trybot_4676/shard-iclb1/igt@gem_ctx_shared@exec-single-timeline-bsd2.html - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6647/shard-iclb4/igt@gem_ctx_shared@exec-single-timeline-bsd2.html - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_13902/shard-iclb1/igt@gem_ctx_shared@exec-single-timeline-bsd2.html - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6649/shard-iclb4/igt@gem_ctx_shared@exec-single-timeline-bsd2.html - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3324/shard-iclb2/igt@gem_ctx_shared@exec-single-timeline-bsd2.html - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_13906/shard-iclb1/igt@gem_ctx_shared@exec-single-timeline-bsd2.html
I think the issue here is related to commit f1c4d157ab9b13c1228f3b8ad7747126785460d0 (HEAD -> drm-intel-next-queued, drm-intel/for-linux-next, drm-intel/drm-intel-next-queued) Author: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Date: Thu Aug 8 12:06:12 2019 +0100 drm/i915: Fix up the inverse mapping for default ctx->engines[] The order in which we store the engines inside default_engines() for the legacy ctx->engines[] has to match the legacy I915_EXEC_RING selector mapping in execbuf::user_map. If we present VCS2 as being the second instance of the video engine, legacy userspace calls that I915_EXEC_BSD2 and so we need to insert it into the second video slot. v2: Record the legacy mapping (hopefully we can remove this need in the future) Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111328 Fixes: 2edda80db3d0 ("drm/i915: Rename engines to match their user interface") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> #v1 Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190808110612.23539-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk but I'm not sure, as my understanding for the bug is that we oversubscribed to an engine and blocked ourselves.
A CI Bug Log filter associated to this bug has been updated: {- ICL: igt@gem_ctx_shared@exec-single-timeline-bsd2 - fail - Failed assertion: nop_sync(i915, ctx, engine, (1000*(1000*(1000)))) == 0 -} {+ ICL: igt@gem_ctx_shared@exec-single-timeline-bsd2 - fail - Failed assertion: nop_sync(i915, ctx, engine, (1000*(1000*(1000)))) == 0 +} New failures caught by the filter: * https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6654/shard-iclb2/igt@gem_ctx_shared@exec-single-timeline-bsd1.html * https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_6655/shard-iclb1/igt@gem_ctx_shared@exec-single-timeline-bsd1.html * https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_338/fi-icl-dsi/igt@gem_ctx_shared@exec-single-timeline-bsd1.html * https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_338/fi-icl-guc/igt@gem_ctx_shared@exec-single-timeline-bsd1.html * https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_338/fi-icl-u2/igt@gem_ctx_shared@exec-single-timeline-bsd1.html * https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_338/fi-icl-u3/igt@gem_ctx_shared@exec-single-timeline-bsd1.html * https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_338/fi-icl-u4/igt@gem_ctx_shared@exec-single-timeline-bsd1.html
commit d5b2a3a4f85ad135123db8fc97ccdbf893546330 Author: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Date: Fri Aug 9 13:31:53 2019 +0100 drm/i915: Check for a second VCS engine more carefully
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.