https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7012/shard-hsw4/igt@gem_eio@in-flight-contexts-10ms.html Starting subtest: in-flight-contexts-10ms (gem_eio:1508) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function trigger_reset, file ../tests/i915/gem_eio.c:85: (gem_eio:1508) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: igt_seconds_elapsed(&ts) <= 10 (gem_eio:1508) CRITICAL: error: 26 > 10 Subtest in-flight-contexts-10ms failed. https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7011/shard-snb7/igt@gem_eio@in-flight-contexts-immediate.html Starting subtest: in-flight-contexts-immediate (gem_eio:3011) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function trigger_reset, file ../tests/i915/gem_eio.c:85: (gem_eio:3011) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: igt_seconds_elapsed(&ts) <= 10 (gem_eio:3011) CRITICAL: error: 39 > 10 Subtest in-flight-contexts-immediate failed.
The CI Bug Log issue associated to this bug has been updated. ### New filters associated * SNB BYT HSW: igt@gem_eio@in-flight-contexts-immediate|igt@gem_eio@in-flight-contexts-10ms - fail - Failed assertion: igt_seconds_elapsed(&ts) <= 10 - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7011/shard-snb7/igt@gem_eio@in-flight-contexts-immediate.html - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14671/shard-snb1/igt@gem_eio@in-flight-contexts-immediate.html - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14677/shard-snb4/igt@gem_eio@in-flight-contexts-immediate.html - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7012/shard-hsw4/igt@gem_eio@in-flight-contexts-10ms.html - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7012/shard-snb2/igt@gem_eio@in-flight-contexts-immediate.html - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14678/shard-snb2/igt@gem_eio@in-flight-contexts-immediate.html - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_384/fi-byt-j1900/igt@gem_eio@in-flight-contexts-10ms.html - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_384/fi-snb-2600/igt@gem_eio@in-flight-contexts-immediate.html - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14681/shard-snb6/igt@gem_eio@in-flight-contexts-immediate.html - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7021/shard-snb6/igt@gem_eio@in-flight-contexts-immediate.html - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3544/shard-snb4/igt@gem_eio@in-flight-contexts-immediate.html - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7024/shard-snb7/igt@gem_eio@in-flight-contexts-immediate.html - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_14686/shard-snb6/igt@gem_eio@in-flight-contexts-immediate.html - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7026/shard-hsw6/igt@gem_eio@in-flight-contexts-10ms.html - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3550/shard-snb1/igt@gem_eio@in-flight-contexts-immediate.html - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_3552/shard-snb7/igt@gem_eio@in-flight-contexts-immediate.html
Hopefully, commit 998e29e137444db6e0ec2c65611a7eab3e0b6a21 Author: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Date: Mon Oct 7 09:26:28 2019 +0100 lib/i915: Bump conservative threshold for ring size We are still hitting the occasional stall upon submission, so be extra caution and leave one more spare. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Still happening https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7124/shard-snb2/igt@gem_eio@in-flight-contexts-immediate.html Starting subtest: in-flight-contexts-immediate (gem_eio:4019) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function trigger_reset, file ../tests/i915/gem_eio.c:90: (gem_eio:4019) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: igt_seconds_elapsed(&ts) <= 10 (gem_eio:4019) CRITICAL: error: 21 > 10 Subtest in-flight-contexts-immediate failed.
A CI Bug Log filter associated to this bug has been updated: {- SNB BYT HSW: igt@gem_eio@in-flight-contexts-immediate|igt@gem_eio@in-flight-contexts-10ms - fail - Failed assertion: igt_seconds_elapsed(&ts) <= 10 -} {+ SNB BYT HSW: igt@gem_eio@in-flight-contexts-immediate|igt@gem_eio@in-flight-contexts-10ms|igt@gem_eio@in-flight-contexts-1us - fail - Failed assertion: igt_seconds_elapsed(&ts) <= 10 +} New failures caught by the filter: * https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7125/shard-snb4/igt@gem_eio@in-flight-contexts-1us.html
Minor issue according to Chris.
Next installment of this saga, commit a64a29e775443e869e4524e5bd3a3427225810dc (upstream/master) Author: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Date: Mon Nov 11 11:36:34 2019 +0000 i915/gem_eio: Flush RCU before timing our own critical sections We cannot control how long RCU takes to find a quiescent point as that depends upon the background load and so may take an arbitrary time. Instead, let's try to avoid that impacting our measurements by inserting an rcu_barrier() before our critical timing sections and hope that hides the issue, letting us always perform a fast reset. Fwiw, we do the expedited RCU synchronize, but that is not always enough. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Acked-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Let's be brave and like all the other times assume that this fixes it for real.
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.