https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_384/fi-hsw-peppy/igt@gem_exec_parse@basic-allocation.html Starting subtest: basic-allocation (gem_exec_parse:1137) ioctl_wrappers-CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function gem_execbuf, file ../lib/ioctl_wrappers.c:609: (gem_exec_parse:1137) ioctl_wrappers-CRITICAL: Failed assertion: __gem_execbuf(fd, execbuf) == 0 (gem_exec_parse:1137) ioctl_wrappers-CRITICAL: error: -12 != 0 Subtest basic-allocation failed.
The CI Bug Log issue associated to this bug has been updated. ### New filters associated * HSW: igt@gem_exec_parse@basic-allocation - fail - Failed assertion: __gem_execbuf(fd, execbuf) == 0 - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_384/fi-hsw-peppy/igt@gem_exec_parse@basic-allocation.html - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_385/fi-hsw-peppy/igt@gem_exec_parse@basic-allocation.html
ENOMEM, sadly not common to all HSW (and not trivially reproducible here) so I presume it's memory configuration and genuine exhaustion. The only real concern is whether we did everything we could to prevent the exhaustion and recover memory for use. For example, it did not originate from shmem_get_pages as we don't have the allocation failure trace, so one of the other kmallocs.
-- GitLab Migration Automatic Message -- This bug has been migrated to freedesktop.org's GitLab instance and has been closed from further activity. You can subscribe and participate further through the new bug through this link to our GitLab instance: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/485.
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.