Bug 112059 - [CI][SHARDS] igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-blocking-wf-vblank - fail - Failed assertion: elapsed >= min && elapsed <= max
Summary: [CI][SHARDS] igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-blocking-wf-vblank - fail - Failed assertio...
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: DRI
Classification: Unclassified
Component: DRM/Intel (show other bugs)
Version: DRI git
Hardware: Other All
: high major
Assignee: Intel GFX Bugs mailing list
QA Contact: Intel GFX Bugs mailing list
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2019-10-18 12:22 UTC by Lakshmi
Modified: 2019-10-21 15:24 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
i915 platform: SKL
i915 features: display/Other


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Lakshmi 2019-10-18 12:22:53 UTC
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7125/shard-skl9/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-blocking-wf-vblank.html
Starting subtest: flip-vs-blocking-wf-vblank
(kms_flip:1016) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function check_final_state, file ../tests/kms_flip.c:1002:
(kms_flip:1016) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: elapsed >= min && elapsed <= max
(kms_flip:1016) CRITICAL: dropped frames, expected 601, counted 600, encoder type 2
Subtest flip-vs-blocking-wf-vblank failed.
Comment 1 CI Bug Log 2019-10-18 12:23:53 UTC
The CI Bug Log issue associated to this bug has been updated.

### New filters associated

* SKL: igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-blocking-wf-vblank - fail - Failed assertion: elapsed &gt;= min &amp;&amp; elapsed &lt;= max
  - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7125/shard-skl9/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-blocking-wf-vblank.html
Comment 2 Caz.Yokoyama 2019-10-21 15:24:38 UTC
set to high/major because of SKL.


Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.