https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_402/fi-icl-dsi/igt@gem_ctx_persistence@rcs0-mixed-process.html Starting subtest: rcs0-mixed-process (gem_ctx_persistence:3575) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function test_process_mixed, file ../tests/i915/gem_ctx_persistence.c:527: (gem_ctx_persistence:3575) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: sync_fence_wait(fence[0], (1000) / 5) == 0 (gem_ctx_persistence:3575) CRITICAL: error: -62 != 0 Subtest rcs0-mixed-process failed. https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7246/shard-apl2/igt@gem_ctx_persistence@rcs0-mixed-process.html Starting subtest: rcs0-mixed-process (gem_ctx_persistence:4362) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function test_process_mixed, file ../tests/i915/gem_ctx_persistence.c:525: (gem_ctx_persistence:4362) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: sync_fence_wait(fence[0], (1000) / 5) == 0 (gem_ctx_persistence:4362) CRITICAL: error: -62 != 0 Subtest rcs0-mixed-process failed.
The CI Bug Log issue associated to this bug has been updated. ### New filters associated * APL ICL: igt@gem_ctx_persistence@rcs0-mixed-process - fail - Failed assertion: sync_fence_wait(fence[0], (1000) / 5) == 0 - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_402/fi-icl-dsi/igt@gem_ctx_persistence@rcs0-mixed-process.html
The examples are too old. Next!
A CI Bug Log filter associated to this bug has been updated: {- APL ICL: igt@gem_ctx_persistence@rcs0-mixed-process - fail - Failed assertion: sync_fence_wait(fence[0], (1000) / 5) == 0 -} {+ APL GLK ICL: igt@gem_ctx_persistence@(rcs0|vcs0)-mixed-process - fail - Failed assertion: sync_fence_wait(fence[0], (1000) / 5) == 0 +} New failures caught by the filter: * https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_5289/shard-glk5/igt@gem_ctx_persistence@vcs0-mixed-process.html
A CI Bug Log filter associated to this bug has been updated: {- APL GLK ICL: igt@gem_ctx_persistence@(rcs0|vcs0)-mixed-process - fail - Failed assertion: sync_fence_wait(fence[0], (1000) / 5) == 0 -} {+ APL GLK ICL: igt@gem_ctx_persistence@(bcs0|rcs0|vcs0)-mixed-process - fail - Failed assertion: sync_fence_wait(fence[0], (1000) / 5) == 0 +} New failures caught by the filter: * https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7362/shard-apl2/igt@gem_ctx_persistence@bcs0-mixed-process.html
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7362/shard-apl2/igt@gem_ctx_persistence@bcs0-mixed-process.html -->try with internal link. https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGT_5289/shard-glk5/igt@gem_ctx_persistence@vcs0-mixed-process.html
commit 3fa72891269b16943e6511166aeebee094206791 (upstream/master, origin/master, origin/HEAD) Author: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Date: Fri Nov 22 00:41:30 2019 +0000 i915/gem_ctx_persistence: Double the fput hammer! Deferred rcu work is tricky to pin down and encourage to run, so try again... Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112277 Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Acked-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
A CI Bug Log filter associated to this bug has been updated: {- APL GLK ICL: igt@gem_ctx_persistence@(bcs0|rcs0|vcs0)-mixed-process - fail - Failed assertion: sync_fence_wait(fence[0], (1000) / 5) == 0 -} {+ APL SKL GLK ICL: igt@gem_ctx_persistence@(bcs0|rcs0|vcs0)-mixed-process - fail - Failed assertion: sync_fence_wait(fence[0], (1000) / 5) == 0 +} New failures caught by the filter: * https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_7412/shard-skl2/igt@gem_ctx_persistence@rcs0-mixed-process.html
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.