Bug 112325 - [CI][DRMTIP]igt@gem_exec_balancer@* - fail - Failed assertion: load > 0.90\n.*minimum load for \d x class:\d was found to be only 0.0% busy
Summary: [CI][DRMTIP]igt@gem_exec_balancer@* - fail - Failed assertion: load > 0.90\n....
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: DRI
Classification: Unclassified
Component: DRM/Intel (show other bugs)
Version: DRI git
Hardware: Other All
: not set not set
Assignee: Intel GFX Bugs mailing list
QA Contact: Intel GFX Bugs mailing list
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2019-11-18 18:21 UTC by Lakshmi
Modified: 2019-11-18 18:27 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
i915 platform: BDW, BSW/CHT
i915 features: GEM/Other

Attachments

Description Lakshmi 2019-11-18 18:21:00 UTC 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_404/fi-bdw-5557u/igt@gem_exec_balancer@full-late-pulse.html
Starting subtest: full-late-pulse
(gem_exec_balancer:1219) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function full, file ../tests/i915/gem_exec_balancer.c:1112:
(gem_exec_balancer:1219) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: load > 0.90
(gem_exec_balancer:1219) CRITICAL: minimum load for 2 x class:2 was found to be only 0.0% busy
Subtest full-late-pulse failed.
**** DEBUG ****
(gem_exec_balancer:1219) igt_kmod-DEBUG: Unknown symbol in module sw_sync or unknown parameter
(gem_exec_balancer:1219) sw_sync-DEBUG: Test requirement passed: kernel_has_sw_sync()
(gem_exec_balancer:1219) igt_kmod-DEBUG: Unknown symbol in module sw_sync or unknown parameter
(gem_exec_balancer:1219) sw_sync-DEBUG: Test requirement passed: kernel_has_sw_sync()
(gem_exec_balancer:1219) igt_dummyload-DEBUG: Test requirement passed: nengine
(gem_exec_balancer:1219) DEBUG: engine[0]: 99.9%
(gem_exec_balancer:1219) DEBUG: elapsed: 10163338ns, load [99.9, 99.9]%
(gem_exec_balancer:1219) igt_debugfs-DEBUG: Opening debugfs directory '/sys/kernel/debug/dri/0'
(gem_exec_balancer:1219) igt_kmod-DEBUG: Unknown symbol in module sw_sync or unknown parameter
(gem_exec_balancer:1219) sw_sync-DEBUG: Test requirement passed: kernel_has_sw_sync()
(gem_exec_balancer:1219) igt_dummyload-DEBUG: Test requirement passed: nengine
(gem_exec_balancer:1219) DEBUG: engine[0]: 100.0%
(gem_exec_balancer:1219) DEBUG: elapsed: 10154122ns, load [100.0, 100.0]%
(gem_exec_balancer:1219) igt_debugfs-DEBUG: Opening debugfs directory '/sys/kernel/debug/dri/0'
(gem_exec_balancer:1219) igt_kmod-DEBUG: Unknown symbol in module sw_sync or unknown parameter
(gem_exec_balancer:1219) sw_sync-DEBUG: Test requirement passed: kernel_has_sw_sync()
(gem_exec_balancer:1219) igt_dummyload-DEBUG: Test requirement passed: nengine
(gem_exec_balancer:1219) DEBUG: engine[0]: 0.0%
(gem_exec_balancer:1219) DEBUG: engine[1]: 0.0%
(gem_exec_balancer:1219) DEBUG: elapsed: 10161716ns, load [0.0, 0.0]%
(gem_exec_balancer:1219) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function full, file ../tests/i915/gem_exec_balancer.c:1112:
(gem_exec_balancer:1219) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: load > 0.90
(gem_exec_balancer:1219) CRITICAL: minimum load for 2 x class:2 was found to be only 0.0% busy
(gem_exec_balancer:1219) igt_core-INFO: Stack trace:
(gem_exec_balancer:1219) igt_core-INFO:   #0 ../lib/igt_core.c:1716 __igt_fail_assert()
(gem_exec_balancer:1219) igt_core-INFO:   #1 ../tests/i915/gem_exec_balancer.c:1023 __real_main1420()
(gem_exec_balancer:1219) igt_core-INFO:   #2 ../tests/i915/gem_exec_balancer.c:1420 main()
(gem_exec_balancer:1219) igt_core-INFO:   #3 ../csu/libc-start.c:344 __libc_start_main()
(gem_exec_balancer:1219) igt_core-INFO:   #4 [_start+0x2a]
****  END  ****
Subtest full-late-pulse: FAIL (0.206s)
Comment 1 CI Bug Log 2019-11-18 18:21:57 UTC 
The CI Bug Log issue associated to this bug has been updated.

### New filters associated

* BSW BDW: igt@gem_exec_balancer@* - fail - Failed assertion: load > 0.90\n.*minimum load for \d x class:\d was found to be only 0.0% busy
  - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_404/fi-bdw-5557u/igt@gem_exec_balancer@full-late-pulse.html
  - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_404/fi-bdw-5557u/igt@gem_exec_balancer@full.html
  - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_404/fi-bdw-5557u/igt@gem_exec_balancer@full-late.html
  - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_404/fi-bdw-5557u/igt@gem_exec_balancer@full-pulse.html
  - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_404/fi-bsw-kefka/igt@gem_exec_balancer@full-late-pulse.html
  - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_404/fi-bsw-kefka/igt@gem_exec_balancer@full.html
  - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_404/fi-bsw-kefka/igt@gem_exec_balancer@full-late.html
  - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_404/fi-bsw-kefka/igt@gem_exec_balancer@full-pulse.html
  - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_404/fi-bsw-n3050/igt@gem_exec_balancer@full-late-pulse.html
  - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_404/fi-bsw-n3050/igt@gem_exec_balancer@full.html
  - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_404/fi-bsw-n3050/igt@gem_exec_balancer@full-late.html
  - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_404/fi-bsw-n3050/igt@gem_exec_balancer@full-pulse.html
  - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_404/fi-bsw-nick/igt@gem_exec_balancer@full-late-pulse.html
  - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_404/fi-bsw-nick/igt@gem_exec_balancer@full.html
  - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_404/fi-bsw-nick/igt@gem_exec_balancer@full-late.html
  - https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_404/fi-bsw-nick/igt@gem_exec_balancer@full-pulse.html
Comment 2 Chris Wilson 2019-11-18 18:27:40 UTC 
Bad igt.

Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.