From: Thomas Dickey <email@example.com>
To: Jim Gettys <Jim.Gettys@hp.com>
Subject: Re: Is you entry of bug 1137 on fd.o?
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 17:04:16 -0400
On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 04:54:34PM -0400, Jim Gettys wrote:
> A request we should update our bits before we ship for a
> to fix a particular bug?
> If so, making it block (currently) bug 351 will raise it
> as a blocker for our upcoming release...
yes. It doesn't dump core, or prevent someone from using xterm, but would
cause some heartburn.
The process that's trying to do the cleanup will hang on "real" Unix systems -
I was told about this on Sunday, and spent several hours finding about the
problem and seeing that the fix is relatively small. (I tested it on HPUX
Thomas E. Dickey
This sounds like it is needed. Is there a place where we can pick up the patch,
or can a patch be attached here?
Created attachment 689 [details] [review]
diff between xterm 195 and 196
should apply cleanly with something like:
patch -p1 -i <diff location>
Patch checked in.