Bug 16393 - [drm-gem classic 965] 'shadowtex' run incorrect as is shown in the attached image
Summary: [drm-gem classic 965] 'shadowtex' run incorrect as is shown in the attached i...
Status: VERIFIED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Mesa
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Drivers/DRI/i965 (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Hardware: Other Linux (All)
: medium normal
Assignee: Eric Anholt
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2008-06-17 02:25 UTC by liuhaien
Modified: 2008-09-26 19:37 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
i915 platform:
i915 features:

Attachments
shadowtex_image (245.45 KB, image/png)
2008-06-17 02:25 UTC, liuhaien 		Details
Xorg.0.log (59.74 KB, text/plain)
2008-06-17 02:26 UTC, liuhaien 		Details
xorg conf file (3.63 KB, text/plain)
2008-06-17 02:26 UTC, liuhaien 		Details
View All

Description liuhaien 2008-06-17 02:25:50 UTC 
Created attachment 17187 [details]
shadowtex_image

System Environment:
--------------------------
Host:           965
Arch:           i386
Kernel:         2.6.25
Libdrm_gem:drm-gem branch       3e48e144992fb11b31875989d45bc8a7c041cdef
Mesa_gem: drm-gem branch        407ce3da3c53c9ebba0fbf827d7b0f610122d44b
Xserver: master                  8c9234a163eceda2abc0a2523e0f5587ea399935
Xf86_video_intel_gem:drm-gem branch    d775ddc64dc8349b8ef9e85b0be9e93cb1997fea

Bug detailed description:
--------------------------
start X,then run 'shadowtex' with CLASSIC,it displays incorrect as is shown in the attached image. 

Reproduce steps:
----------------
1.xinit&
2.export INTEL_NO_GEM=1
3../shadowtex
Comment 1 liuhaien 2008-06-17 02:26:23 UTC 
Created attachment 17188 [details]
Xorg.0.log
Comment 2 liuhaien 2008-06-17 02:26:39 UTC 
Created attachment 17189 [details]
xorg conf file
Comment 3 Shuang He 2008-07-13 23:41:29 UTC 
This issue still exist with latest codes.
Comment 4 liuhaien 2008-07-29 22:40:54 UTC 
it still exists with the latest GEM.
Comment 5 lin, jiewen 2008-09-03 01:52:55 UTC 
It still exists on the current classic.
Comment 6 Gordon Jin 2008-09-16 18:28:10 UTC 
Haihao says this is a depth_stencil texture issue, and should has been fixed.
Haien, please validate with the latest unstable package.
Comment 7 liuhaien 2008-09-17 17:46:23 UTC 
this bug has been blocked by bug #17621
Comment 8 Ian Romanick 2008-09-22 17:42:32 UTC 
I'm able to reproduce this in GEM mode as well.  Toggling out of packed depth-stencil mode (using the 'p' key) corrects the rendering.  This is with Mesa master.
Comment 9 Eric Anholt 2008-09-25 15:27:57 UTC 
Works on my G965 in both GEM and classic mode now (after I fixed depth_stencil fallout).
Comment 10 liuhaien 2008-09-26 19:36:53 UTC 
verified.

Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.