Created attachment 18774 [details] The LaTeX source file If I use the T1 fonts in LaTeX, Evince cannot print the PDF files any more. Actually printing takes very long and outputs a rastered image. With the Adobe Reader everything works fine. In the related Ubuntu bug report (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evince/+bug/227186), Sebastian Bacher asked to open a bug report for poppler. Actually I'm not sure, whether this is a bug in poppler or in cairo. There is another related bug report in Launchpad (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cupsys/+bug/150187). Here are the details: I created a small sample LaTeX file (test.tex), which demonstrates the bug. If I compile it without the "fontenc" package using pdflatex, everything works fine in Evince. I named this PDF file "good.pdf". If I compile it with the "fontenc" package (and the option "T1", which uses fonts of a certain LaTeX font encoding), pdflatex creates a PDF file ("wrong.pdf") that Evince cannot print correctly any more. I also attach the printing output of Evince, when using the PDF printer. I named these file "good.printed.pdf" and "wrong.printed.pdf". The following graphic illustrates the described setting. test.tex pdflatex: / \ good.pdf wrong.pdf Evince: | | good.printed.pdf wrong.printed.pdf Since the problem is somehow related to fonts, I also compile the font information of pdffonts and the Adobe Reader in the following: pdffonts on good.pdf: name type emb sub uni object ID ------------------------------------ ----------------- --- --- --- --------- FYHDIM+CMSSBX10 Type 1 yes yes no 4 0 PTMTFG+CMR10 Type 1 yes yes no 5 0 pdffonts on good.printed.pdf: name type emb sub uni object ID ------------------------------------ ----------------- --- --- --- --------- UFQSLH+f-1-0 Type 1C yes yes yes 10 0 ZRSKVS+f-0-0 Type 1C yes yes yes 8 0 pdffonts on wrong.pdf: name type emb sub uni object ID ------------------------------------ ----------------- --- --- --- --------- [none] Type 3 yes no no 4 0 [none] Type 3 yes no no 5 0 pdffonts on wrong.printed.pdf: name type emb sub uni object ID ------------------------------------ ----------------- --- --- --- --------- Adobe Reader on good.pdf: CMR10 (Eingebettete Untergruppe) [engl: embedded subgroup] Typ: Type 1 Kodierung: Mitgeliefert [engl: Coding: shipped/supported] CMSSBX10 (Eingebettete Untergruppe) Typ: Type 1 Kodierung: Mitgeliefert Adobe Reader on good.printed.pdf: f-0-0 (Eingebettete Untergruppe) Typ: Type 1 Kodierung: Benutzerdefiniert [engl: Coding: User defined] f-1-0 (Eingebettete Untergruppe) Typ: Type 1 Kodierung: Benutzerdefiniert Adobe Reader on wrong.pdf: F16 Typ: Type 3 Kodierung: Benutzerdefiniert Originalschrift: F16 [engl: source/former/original font: F16] Originalschrifttyp: Type 3 [engl: original font type: Type 3] F19 Typ: Type 3 Kodierung: Benutzerdefiniert Originalschrift: F19 Originalschrifttyp: Type 3 Adobe Reader on wrong.printed.pdf: (Empty widget) Evince states version 2.22.2 with poppler 0.6.4 (cairo). It's the Ubuntu 8.04 package. If you need any more information, I'd be glad to help. Sincerly, Simon
Created attachment 18775 [details] pdflatex creates this PDF file, if I omit the fontenc package
Created attachment 18776 [details] The printing output of Evince for good.pdf
Created attachment 18777 [details] pdflatex creates this PDF file, if I use the T1 fonts
Created attachment 18778 [details] The printing output of Evince for wrong.pdf
> pdffonts on wrong.pdf: > name type emb sub uni object ID > ------------ --------- --- --- --- --------- > [none] Type 3 yes no no 4 0 > [none] Type 3 yes no no 5 0 Note the Type3 fonts. That means that you ended up with metafont- rendered bitmap fonts rather than type1 fonts. Specifically the ec fonts which are typically found at: /usr/share/texmf-dist/fonts/source/jknappen/ec/ You may prefer to get the LatinModern fonts, outline fonts which cover the subset of ec text-font glyphs which LaTeX uses. (The math fonts, when using lm, are the same CM Type1 fonts your good.pdf example would have used, had it had any math.) That said, it is indeed a bug that evince cannot correctly handle Type3 bitmap fonts. And probably means that it also cannot handle Type3 vector fonts. Whether the bug is in evince, poppler, cairo is a good question. Cairo has had some recent changes which may be relevant. Since you point at launchpad, I presum you use Ubuntu; you, therefore, are probably using rather old versions of poppler and cairo....
I agree: The main problem is, that evince/poppler/cairo cannot print Type 3 fonts. But - I regularly receive or download some PDF files with Type 3 fonts - Evince _can show_ them correctly on the screen (with each letter markable on its own) - Adobe Reader can show them correctly on the screen and print them to PostScript - Evince cannot print them. And if I look at many bug reports in the Internet, I'm not the only one receiving such documents. (Actually there are much more bug reports I consider to be related as those two linked in my original posting.) So, thanks for pointing out the LaTeX behaviour. Indeed, the EC package can solve it as it switches to Type 1 fonts. But this is only of help, if I have the LaTeX sources. Again thanks James and best regards, Simon
xpdf/poppler (via Gentoo’s ebuild) can print wrong.pdf to PS in an optimal way (the fonts are converted to PS Type3 fonts and the strings are shown). Ghostscript 8.63’s cairo backend handles wrong.pdf as well as expected: all of the glyphs are output as filled paths. (The cairo backend is advertized to do just that with any fonts). The filled paths, though, look like squares making up the individual pixels of the bitmaps. GS 8.63’s pdfwrite does a much better job than you got from 8.61: :; pdfinfo wrong.printed.pdf Producer: GPL Ghostscript 8.61 CreationDate: Tue Sep 9 12:03:47 2008 ModDate: Tue Sep 9 12:03:47 2008 Tagged: no Pages: 1 Encrypted: no Page size: 595 x 842 pts (A4) File size: 299281 bytes Optimized: no PDF version: 1.4 :; pdfinfo wrong_pdfwrite.pdf Producer: GPL Ghostscript 8.63 CreationDate: Fri Sep 12 13:54:23 2008 ModDate: Fri Sep 12 13:54:23 2008 Tagged: no Pages: 1 Encrypted: no Page size: 595.28 x 841.89 pts (A4) File size: 7804 bytes Optimized: no PDF version: 1.4 Said output also looks better when viewed on screen. Also, poppler’s pdftops seems to work well on wrong.pdf (as of poppler commit 217c0d1f80a78713977a7bfbe680fce90f1c6b36). As well as xpdf/poppler does. This suggests that if the bug is in poppler it has been fixed, or that the bug in in evince. Unfortunately, I cannot test in evince because I seem to have updated poppler and evince but not poppler-bindings, which prevented evince’s configure from finding libpoppler. [SIGH] I’ll have to update again and try then. Probably not until Sunday, though.
pdftops alone fails on wrong.pdf. (Version 3.02, from poppler-utils 0.6.4-1ubuntu1 in Ubuntu 8.04). Instead of characters I get see squares of garbage. With the -level1 option the output seems fine. I haven't tried a more recent release yet.
Created attachment 18985 [details] pdftops wrong.pdf <- version from poppler-utils 0.6.4-1ubuntu1 amd64
Created attachment 18986 [details] pdftops -level1 wrong.pdf <- version from poppler-utils 0.6.4-1ubuntu1 amd64 This one looks ok.
I am out of X right now, but I am pretty sure that pdftops/poppler from poppler git master of a few days ago gave reasonable output. I can say that, for each of levels 1, 2 and 3, it generates Type3 PostScript fonts for each of the Typd3 PDF fonts and outputs the text using show-type ops. The biggest difference between the level1 and level2 output is that l1 uses hex and level2 uses ascii85 encoding for the images which make up the type3 fonts. Level3 only adds better support fir CID-keyed fonts over the level2 output. [Time passes...] I ran those ps files thru gs -sDEVICE=pbm -r75 (which creates ascii PBM files), opened them in emacs and removed the newlines after each 64- character long line, thereby having one line of 0s and 1s for each pixel row of the image. That shows that gs 8.63, at least, can handle the PS output by pdftops/poppler (of git master) just fine. I suspect, then, that this part of your problem is due to the outdated version of poppler in the version of Ubuntu you have installed. (poppler 0.6.4 is OLD.) Git master poppler and cairo do not fully fix the problem when using evince to print. Evince generates new PDF or PS using cairo when printing. The resulting files are ugly. I found that evince needed tens of minutes to print wrong.pdf to a ps file on my 1GHz PIIIM. The resulting ps has 847 fallback images of the form: % Fallback Image: x=149, y=129, w=3, h=2 res=300dpi size=351 [ 0.24 0 0 0.24 149 660.839983 ] concat /DeviceRGB setcolorspace 8 dict dup begin /ImageType 1 def /Width 13 def /Height 9 def /BitsPerComponent 8 def /Decode [ 0 1 0 1 0 1 ] def /DataSource currentfile /ASCII85Decode filter /LZWDecode filter def /ImageMatrix [ 1 0 0 -1 0 9 ] def end image J3Vsg3$]7K#D>EP:q1$o*=mro@So+\<\5,H7Uo7+~>Q q 0 0 612 792 rectclip If you use something like pdftk(1) to uncompress the PDF evince generates you find similar output there, too. I'm not sure where the fault lies in terms of evince, poppler or cairo. Evince probably should use cairo's userfont API. It probably should also use poppler's pdftops code for generating PS from PDF, and pass PDF thru as is when generating PDF from PDF. IE, evince probably ought to have document-backend-specific routines for generating PS and PDF for printing. I *think*, then, that -- at least when using current tip versions -- the bug is in evince, not in poppler.
(In reply to comment #11) > I found that evince needed tens of minutes to print wrong.pdf to a ps > file on my 1GHz PIIIM. The resulting ps has 847 fallback images of > the form: > > % Fallback Image: x=149, y=129, w=3, h=2 res=300dpi size=351 > [ 0.24 0 0 0.24 149 660.839983 ] concat > /DeviceRGB setcolorspace > 8 dict dup begin > /ImageType 1 def > /Width 13 def > /Height 9 def > /BitsPerComponent 8 def > /Decode [ 0 1 0 1 0 1 ] def > /DataSource currentfile /ASCII85Decode filter /LZWDecode filter def > /ImageMatrix [ 1 0 0 -1 0 9 ] def > end > image > J3Vsg3$]7K#D>EP:q1$o*=mro@So+\<\5,H7Uo7+~>Q > q 0 0 612 792 rectclip > > If you use something like pdftk(1) to uncompress the PDF evince > generates you find similar output there, too. > > I'm not sure where the fault lies in terms of evince, poppler or > cairo. Evince probably should use cairo's userfont API. It > probably should also use poppler's pdftops code for generating > PS from PDF, and pass PDF thru as is when generating PDF from PDF. It is a limitation of the cairo backend of poppler that it can't print Type 3 fonts nicely. When cairo 1.8 is released with the new user-font API it will be possible to fix this in poppler. Cairo user-fonts are embedded in PS/PDF as a Type 3 font.
> It is a limitation of the cairo backend of poppler that it can't print > Type 3 fonts nicely. When cairo 1.8 is released with the new user-font > API it will be possible to fix this in poppler. Cairo user-fonts are > embedded in PS/PDF as a Type 3 font. Although I generally use xpdf/poppler for reading PDFs and evince only for forms, I am available to help test if you are willing to increase poppler master’s required cairo version to either cairo/master or the current pre-release (1.7.6) and start using the user-font API on master now rather than after cairo makes its 1.8.0 release. (I find this to be an intriguing bug to quash.)
Not right now, we are in process of converting trunk into stable so you'll have to wait until October 9 that is when trunk will be open again for non bugfixes
Maybe this bug is related to https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12769 ?
Fix in git.
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.