Bug 20480 - [RV280 9200] Videos have very slow frame rate
Summary: [RV280 9200] Videos have very slow frame rate
Status: RESOLVED INVALID
Alias: None
Product: xorg
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Driver/Radeon (show other bugs)
Version: 7.3 (2007.09)
Hardware: Other Linux (All)
: high normal
Assignee: xf86-video-ati maintainers
QA Contact: Xorg Project Team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2009-03-05 01:30 UTC by Bryce Harrington
Modified: 2016-02-24 05:38 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
i915 platform:
i915 features:


Attachments
Xorg.0.log - failing on Intrepid (6.10.x -ati) with XAA (55.38 KB, text/x-log)
2009-03-05 01:30 UTC, Bryce Harrington
no flags Details
Xorg.0.log - Jaunty (6.10.0) (64.13 KB, patch)
2009-03-05 01:32 UTC, Bryce Harrington
no flags Details | Splinter Review
Xorg.0.log from OpenSUSE 11.1 (58.17 KB, patch)
2009-03-05 01:35 UTC, Bryce Harrington
no flags Details | Splinter Review

Description Bryce Harrington 2009-03-05 01:30:19 UTC
Created attachment 23558 [details]
Xorg.0.log - failing on Intrepid (6.10.x -ati) with XAA

Forwarding this bug from a Ubuntu reporter:
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-ati/+bug/291480

[Problem]
On a Radeon 9200 videos have slow frame rate as does scrolling.  Seems to occur both for XAA and EXA.

[lspci]
(--) PCI:*(0@1:0:0) ATI Technologies Inc RV280 [Radeon 9200 PRO] rev 1, Mem @ 0xd8000000/0, 0xe9000000/0, I/O @ 0x0000a000/0, BIOS @ 0x????????/131072
(--) PCI: (0@1:0:1) ATI Technologies Inc RV280 [Radeon 9200 PRO] (Secondary) rev 1, Mem @ 0xe0000000/0, 0xe9010000/0

[Original Report]
Trying to see full-screen videos at Youtube or at news sites, etc., the problem it's that all the videos have a very, VERY slow frame rate, it simply can't be viewed normally... Annoying. Also, just scrolling windows in Ubuntu 8.10 (and in previous versions), sometimes it lags behind the mouse, stop and walk repeatedly, somewhat just spoiling the user experience in this OS.

Yes, my Video Card is a Radeon 9200 / 9250 of 125mb and I know that ATI not longer supports its drivers for the X-Org version that Ubuntu currently uses, only until X-Org 7.1. So EnvyNG is not useful in my case.

My hardware specs: Processor: AMD 2800+, Videocard: ATI Radeon 9200 of 125 MB, Memory: 768MB of RAM.

In Windows XP the videocard it's fast enough to see anything seamlessly. However, in Mandriva One 2009 as well as in openSUSE 11... Well, too!!

Before uninstalling openSUSE 11 (because rpm is -far- behind deb specially when installing binaries not from repositories and sometimes even so) I did see the videos in openSUSE 11 at full-screen as fast as like in Windows. Nice! The whole OS runs seamlessly, without any lag. This OS recognizes the maker and exact model of my video card, which otherwise it's a quite common videocard.

Then, I've also tried Mandriva One 2009 and (even just from a Live-CD session, without installing it!) I also can see the YouTube videos at full screen at normal FPS then without lagging at all other windows, also.

If openSUSE and Mandriva are indeed shipping with full videocard drivers support, I wonder if Ubuntu can do the same asap.. It would be really nice for the users and evidently, it's feasible as these other open Linux distros are doing it already.

With Ubuntu having just this, it easily would be the best choice, and not only regarding Linux based OSes.

About the driver I do use,
:~$ glxinfo | grep render
IRQ's not enabled, falling back to busy waits: 0 16
direct rendering: Yes
OpenGL renderer string: Mesa DRI R200 20060602 AGP 8x x86/MMX+/3DNow!+/SSE TCL

I just've installed Ubuntu 8.10 without modification (I installed the normal multimedia codecs and also, for Firefox, the Flash player plugin and Java, to see web videos).

Before that, trying to get better video performance I have installed DRIconf and I've set up all its settings to the minimum: minimum image quality, minimum texture units (2), using HiperZ to enhance performance, etc. all of which has been a bit helpful as before that the frames in 5.0 seconds didn't go higher than 4200 or so (at its best). Now the OS goes notably faster, scrolling the windows not longer lag.

But the videos still had a quite poor FPS, the video buttons mostly don't respond when full size video is displaying (about 3 seconds delay to respond since clicking on stop or when trying to change volume.. Sometimes even fail to respond and so one has to click several times).

With the gstreamer-properties set to W windows (without Xv) perhaps the Youtube videos go slightly faster.. The sliding bar for the volume and the other buttons it lag (just) about 2 second now. The images go also a bit quicker, but not smooth. And still each few seconds the image freezes for an instant at its own or when passing the mouse over (or trying to click) a button.
Comment 1 Bryce Harrington 2009-03-05 01:32:28 UTC
Created attachment 23559 [details] [review]
Xorg.0.log - Jaunty (6.10.0)
Comment 2 Bryce Harrington 2009-03-05 01:35:13 UTC
Created attachment 23560 [details] [review]
Xorg.0.log from OpenSUSE 11.1

Here's the log from booting OpenSUSE.
Comment 3 Joel 2009-03-05 04:25:44 UTC
This bug also affects me (see https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-ati/+bug/291480/comments/10)

Thank you if you can see what is wrong about it.
Comment 4 Alex Deucher 2009-03-05 07:23:18 UTC
Is this just flash that is affected?  Are there different versions of flash installed on each system?
Comment 5 Michel Dänzer 2009-03-05 07:44:36 UTC
Which Flash plugin is being used, and how does it render the videos?

I looked into this a bit for the swfdec plugin, and there the problem seems to be that it uses RENDER transformed RepeatNone pictures for scaling, and the driver can't accelerate that due to weird RENDER spec semantics for RepeatNone. Using RepeatPad instead would avoid this, but there might be more issues down the road.
Comment 6 Bryce Harrington 2009-03-05 14:06:16 UTC
I've asked the original reporter what flash plugin he's using.

Possibly he's using the regular Ubuntu flash plugin, which for me on jaunty is:

Shockwave Flash
    File name: npwrapper.libflashplayer.so
    Shockwave Flash 10.0 r22

Comment 7 Christopher M. Penalver 2016-02-24 05:38:25 UTC
Invalid downstream.


Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.