using last gentoo-stable with git radeonhd driver&git vanilla kernel sources.
urxvt goes corrupt after moving its window/working inside.
changes anything urxvt configs, trying to enable/disable xcompmgr/compiz gives nothing with EXA acceleration.
urxvt works fine with XAA acceleration.
thats with enabled dri(xv). if disabling dri(xv) from xorg config urxvt works fine.
Created attachment 25040 [details]
Created attachment 25041 [details]
Created attachment 25042 [details]
Created attachment 25043 [details] [review]
(In reply to comment #0)
> changes anything urxvt configs, trying to enable/disable xcompmgr/compiz gives
> nothing with EXA acceleration.
> urxvt works fine with XAA acceleration.
There is no XAA for r6xx and newer chips, so you probably end up with no accel or shadowfb. Also compiz requires a 3D driver which is not yet ready so it won't work at all right now.
Current status is :
* It should provide EXA acceleration, Xv acceleration.
whats about it?
Yes, EXA and Xv are supported, but XAA is not.
2D Acceleration (EXA)*R700 (RHD)= DONE
oh sry once more.
thats bug according to supported feature EXA&XV (;
and so ... for compiz/xcompmgr EXA enough.
just waiting another someones answer ...
(In reply to comment #10)
> oh sry once more.
> thats bug according to supported feature EXA&XV (;
> and so ... for compiz/xcompmgr EXA enough.
> just waiting another someones answer ...
There are two different Xorg 2D acceleration architectures: EXA and XAA. Only EXA is supported on r6xx/r7xx hardware.
compiz requires 3D (provided by a separate 3D mesa driver which is not not yet useable). compiz will not work with just EXA. xcompmgr uses render so it will work with EXA.
yeah .. yr right =)
>>> xcompmgr uses render so it will work with EXA.
im using only xcompmgr now ( compiz not installed ) ... and was forgotten about differences compiz/xcompmgr ... and was sayed that its same ... sry
Does this issue occur with the preferred ati driver (xf86-vide-ati)? If so, please move this to the Driver/Radeon component.
Development of radeonhd has pretty much halted and development focus is on the ati driver. Please see http://www.x.org/wiki/radeonhd
If the issue does not exist in the ati driver (or if there is no response to this message), this bug will be closed as WONTFIX unless someone contributes a patch.
Closing due to lack of response. Please reopen and move to the Driver/Radeon
component if this issue persists with xf86-video-ati