Bug 22886 - [GM965/KMS/UXA] memory corruption on resume from hibernate
Summary: [GM965/KMS/UXA] memory corruption on resume from hibernate
Status: RESOLVED NOTOURBUG
Alias: None
Product: xorg
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Driver/intel (show other bugs)
Version: 7.4 (2008.09)
Hardware: Other All
: medium normal
Assignee: ykzhao
QA Contact: Xorg Project Team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2009-07-22 00:37 UTC by Evgeni Golov
Modified: 2010-03-11 17:38 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
i915 platform:
i915 features:


Attachments

Description Evgeni Golov 2009-07-22 00:37:19 UTC
Hi,

I have a ThinkPad X300 here, with a GM965 inside. Running kernel 2.6.30.1 (and 2.6.31-rc3), xf86-video-intel 2.8.0, xorg 1.6.2. Ah, and its all x86_64 here, Debian Sid.

When I have KMS enabled, about 50% of my resumes from hibernate (disk) end up absolutely fubar: X is there, I can move the mouse, type, the running apps run fine, but new ones segfault right after the start (or die with an assertion error).

As soon I disable KMS, I can't reproduce this behaviour anymore.

Not sure this really belongs to xorg/intel, and not to drm/intel or kernel/intel, but I hope there is someone who can push me in the right direction (esp wrt getting useful debug information here).
Comment 1 Evgeni Golov 2009-07-22 01:06:35 UTC
After some more testing, it looks more like a kernel issue here.
Previously I suspended with "pm-suspend" which uses uswsusp if its there, and plain old kernel suspend if its not. I tried both with the same results, but both from X.

Now I disabled X, rebooted, and just did a plain
echo disk > /sys/power/state
and got the very same segfaults after resume.
Comment 2 ykzhao 2009-07-22 02:19:36 UTC
Hi, Evgeni
    Thanks for the test.
    From the description it seems that this is a kernel bug rather than intel graphics bug.
    Will you please open a new bug in kernel bugzilla?
    Thanks.
Comment 3 ykzhao 2009-07-22 02:21:44 UTC
As this is a kernel bug rather than intel graphics driver bug, this bug will be rejected and marked as "NOTOURBUG".
Thanks.
Comment 4 ccc1 2010-03-11 02:27:19 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
>Will you please open a new bug in kernel bugzilla?
>Thanks.
hi ykzhao,
can you have a look at the bug that was assigned to you at the kernel bug tracker[1]? the  bug is open for six months and the issue still persist!

cheers

[1]http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13811
Comment 5 ykzhao 2010-03-11 17:38:39 UTC
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> >Will you please open a new bug in kernel bugzilla?
> >Thanks.
> hi ykzhao,
> can you have a look at the bug that was assigned to you at the kernel bug
> tracker[1]? the  bug is open for six months and the issue still persist!
> 
> cheers
> 
> [1]http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13811

Sorry for the late response. I will look at this issue in bug13811.

Thanks for the reminder.

> 



Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.