Bug 24053 - MMC cards aren't automounted.
MMC cards aren't automounted.
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: udisks
Classification: Unclassified
Component: detection
unspecified
Other All
: medium normal
Assigned To: David Zeuthen (not reading bugmail)
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2009-09-20 16:57 UTC by maximlevitsky
Modified: 2009-10-09 06:52 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
i915 platform:
i915 features:


Attachments
git formatted patch (933 bytes, patch)
2009-10-09 06:00 UTC, Martin Pitt
Details | Splinter Review

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description maximlevitsky 2009-09-20 16:57:42 UTC
The core of this problem lies in:

 /lib/udev/rules.d/95-devkit-disks.rules:

ENV{DKD_PRESENTATION_NOPOLICY}="1"
KERNEL=="sd*|hd*|sr*", ENV{DKD_PRESENTATION_NOPOLICY}="0"

Thus, DKD_PRESENTATION_NOPOLICY is set on anything but hard disks and cdroms (and this includes usb drives)

However MMC/SD devices are reported as mmcblk*. There are also so called memstick devices, that are reported as mspblk*


So lets change those lines to:


ENV{DKD_PRESENTATION_NOPOLICY}="1"
KERNEL=="sd*|hd*|sr*|mmcblk*|mspblk*", ENV{DKD_PRESENTATION_NOPOLICY}="0"


Also there might be other devices, like floppy and maybe more.

The above change works for me
Comment 1 Martin Pitt 2009-10-09 05:56:31 UTC
Indeed, this makes sense. For the record, this is a complete dk-disks --dump which shows the problem:

http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33354340/devkit_dump.txt
Comment 2 Martin Pitt 2009-10-09 06:00:09 UTC
Created attachment 30217 [details] [review]
git formatted patch

Trivial patch, but with nice changelog, and with Maxim set as author. For David's convenience of just doing git am. :-)
Comment 3 David Zeuthen (not reading bugmail) 2009-10-09 06:52:18 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> Created an attachment (id=30217) [details]
> git formatted patch
> 
> Trivial patch, but with nice changelog, and with Maxim set as author. For
> David's convenience of just doing git am. :-)

Looks good. I've committed this with a different Subject line and added your name to the Signed-off-by line too. Thanks.