Bug 26287 - radeonhd driver for Xpress1250 gives (EE) Unsupported PowerPlayInfo Revision, no X
Summary: radeonhd driver for Xpress1250 gives (EE) Unsupported PowerPlayInfo Revision,...
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: xorg
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Driver/radeonhd (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86 (IA32) Linux (All)
: medium normal
Assignee: Egbert Eich
QA Contact: Xorg Project Team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2010-01-27 14:00 UTC by Stuart Ladd
Modified: 2011-11-07 15:22 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
i915 platform:
i915 features:


Attachments
Xorg.1.log (log of a radeonhd run) (33.78 KB, text/x-log)
2010-01-27 14:00 UTC, Stuart Ladd
no flags Details

Description Stuart Ladd 2010-01-27 14:00:46 UTC
Created attachment 32860 [details]
Xorg.1.log (log of a radeonhd run)

Hi I don't know if this is helpful but I'd like to get my card supported. With the radeon driver, I get poor 2D acceleration (especially flash, vlc etc. are OK) but I can't get X to start with the radeonhd driver (version 1.3.0+git20100104 from ubuntu xorg-edgers). All with metacity, not compiz.

Starting gdm gives me a dialogue with just the (EE)'s below and an OK button. After pressing OK I get the choice to drop to a console or reconfigure X etc.

My xorg is the basic automatic configuration but with driver specified as radeonhd and resolution set to match my laptop+external monitor setup working with the plain radeon driver.

#cat xorg.0.log...
(II) RADEONHD(0): ATOM BIOS Rom: 
	SubsystemVendorID: 0x1854 SubsystemID: 0x011b
	IOBaseAddress: 0x9000
	Filename: br26548.bin 
	BIOS Bootup Message: 
ATI Radeon Xpress 1250 for LG/Elbrus   
...
(EE) RADEONHD(0): Unusupported PowerPlayInfo Revision
(EE) RADEONHD(0): Power Management: Cannot get known good chip configurations

#lspci -v...
01:05.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon Xpress 1250
	Subsystem: LG Electronics, Inc. Device 011b
	Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 64, IRQ 18
	Memory at d0000000 (64-bit, prefetchable) [size=256M]
	Memory at cfef0000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=64K]
	I/O ports at 9000 [size=256]
	Capabilities: <access denied>
	Kernel modules: radeon

#xrandr -q
Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 3200 x 1080, maximum 3200 x 1080
VGA-0 connected 1920x1080+1280+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 531mm x 299mm
   1920x1080      60.0*+   60.0  
   1280x1024      60.0  
   1440x900       59.9  
   1280x800       59.8  
   1152x864       75.0  
   1024x768       70.1     60.0  
   800x600        60.3     56.2  
   640x480        66.7     59.9  
   720x400        70.1  
LVDS connected 1280x800+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 286mm x 179mm
   1280x800       59.9*+
   1280x720       59.9  
   1152x768       59.8  
   1024x768       59.9  
   800x600        59.9  
   640x480        59.4  
HDMI-0 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)

#cat xorg.conf
Section "Screen"
	Identifier	"Configured Screen Device"
	Device	"Configured Video Device"
	SubSection "Display"
		Virtual	3200 1080
	EndSubSection
EndSection

Section "Device"
	Identifier	"Configured Video Device"
	Driver		"radeonhd"
EndSection
Comment 1 Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia 2011-10-16 16:00:02 UTC
Does this issue occur with the preferred ati driver (xf86-vide-ati)?  If so, please move this to the Driver/Radeon component.  

Development of radeonhd has pretty much halted and development focus is on the ati driver.  Please see http://www.x.org/wiki/radeonhd

If the issue does not exist in the ati driver (or if there is no response to this message), this bug will be closed as WONTFIX unless someone contributes a patch.
Comment 2 Jeremy Huddleston Sequoia 2011-11-07 15:22:30 UTC
Closing due to lack of response.  Please reopen and move to the Driver/Radeon 
component if this issue persists with xf86-video-ati


Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.