on third page, it is listed in annotation which characters suppose to use for kashmiri
so they are quite different from presently included ur.orth file
"ur.orth" or "ks.orth"?
Oh I see what you mean. I just updated the Uyghar orth. Does that resolve this bug?
i think some confusion
ur.orth included in ks.orth, but there are some characters in Unicode Code chart those are specifically for kashmiri
so i think this character should come in ks.orth file
no patch :(
I guess this is what you expect:
Created attachment 53389 [details]
included kashmiri character from Unicode 6.0
Thanks tagoh for motivation was bit lazy :)
Even in ks.orth already comment present
"# Unicode 5.1 does not contain all the letters required in the orthography,
# including Wavy Hamza Below and the Alef Maksura With Ring Below. We'll
# just include Urdu for now."
(In reply to comment #5)
> Created attachment 53389 [details]
> included kashmiri character from Unicode 6.0
> Thanks tagoh for motivation was bit lazy :)
> Even in ks.orth already comment present
> "# Unicode 5.1 does not contain all the letters required in the orthography,
> # including Wavy Hamza Below and the Alef Maksura With Ring Below. We'll
> # just include Urdu for now."
> reference http://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/U0600.pdf
Is it everything to support Kashmiri? or still missing any glyphs and better keep the above comment for further improvement?
Yes that statement not required now. This is sufficient.
Thanks. proposed patch is here:
Fixed in dedc1673.
on Jun 27, 2016 at 13:01:37.
(provided by the Example extension).