Bug 3209 - x11-base/xorg-x11-6.8.99.5 : INVALID MEM ALLOCATION
Summary: x11-base/xorg-x11-6.8.99.5 : INVALID MEM ALLOCATION
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 2373
Alias: None
Product: xorg
Classification: Unclassified
Component: * Other (show other bugs)
Version: 6.8.99.5
Hardware: x86 (IA32) Linux (All)
: high normal
Assignee: Egbert Eich
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
: 3771 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-05-04 18:19 UTC by Nuno Alexandre
Modified: 2005-11-20 14:17 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:
i915 platform:
i915 features:

Attachments
xorg.log (37.58 KB, text/plain)
2005-05-04 18:19 UTC, Nuno Alexandre 		no flags Details
xorg.conf (1.37 KB, text/plain)
2005-05-05 07:28 UTC, Nuno Alexandre 		no flags Details
View All

Description Nuno Alexandre 2005-05-04 18:19:09 UTC 
current testing branch of Xorg on Gentoo GNU/Linux -

[27] -1 0       0x00004c40 - 0x00004c80 (0x41) IX[B]
        [28] -1 0       0x00004c00 - 0x00004c40 (0x41) IX[B]
        [29] -1 0       0x0000e400 - 0x0000e420 (0x21) IX[B]
(WW) ****INVALID MEM ALLOCATION**** b: 0xe0000000 e: 0xe8000000 correcting^G
(II) window:
        [0] -1  0       0xe0000000 - 0xe7ffffff (0x8000000) MX[B]
(II) resSize:
        [0] -1  0       0x00000000 - 0xffffffff (0x100000000) MX[B]



Attached is complete Xorg.log
Comment 1 Nuno Alexandre 2005-05-04 18:19:44 UTC 
Created attachment 2618 [details]
xorg.log

xorg.log
Comment 2 Nuno Alexandre 2005-05-05 07:28:34 UTC 
Created attachment 2621 [details]
xorg.conf

xorg.conf
Comment 3 Luc Verhaegen 2005-07-14 21:14:33 UTC 
*** Bug 3771 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Luc Verhaegen 2005-07-15 00:09:06 UTC 
This is a problem with lnx_pci.c:xf86GetOSOffsetFromPCI introduced with the
application of bug 2373 (rev 1.4 of lnx_pci.c). I'll try to make a small patch
available that fixes this particular problem, but Egbert is working on a more
thorough solution.
Comment 5 Luc Verhaegen 2005-07-15 05:42:19 UTC 
Actually, Egbert still has 2373 open, so this bug is probably a duplicate of
that one. Will attach patch there.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 2373 ***

Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.