Bug 35232 - [PATCH] document systemd transport in the spec
Summary: [PATCH] document systemd transport in the spec
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: dbus
Classification: Unclassified
Component: core (show other bugs)
Version: 1.4.x
Hardware: Other All
: medium normal
Assignee: Rob Taylor
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard: patch missing
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2011-03-11 14:59 UTC by Lennart Poettering
Modified: 2014-09-25 14:19 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
i915 platform:
i915 features:


Attachments
the patch (3.69 KB, patch)
2011-03-11 14:59 UTC, Lennart Poettering
Details | Splinter Review
spec patch (2.60 KB, patch)
2011-08-24 15:48 UTC, Lennart Poettering
Details | Splinter Review
Rebased to current git (2.49 KB, patch)
2012-02-01 20:18 UTC, Lennart Poettering
Details | Splinter Review

Description Lennart Poettering 2011-03-11 14:59:29 UTC
Created attachment 44373 [details] [review]
the patch

The systemd transport has been part of D-Bus since a while, so it's time to document it, given that the launchd transport is actually documented in the specification.
Comment 1 Lennart Poettering 2011-03-11 15:01:07 UTC
The patch is on top of the documentation patch in 35230, as a side note. If this is OK to commit and 35230 isn't in by then I can rebase it trivially.
Comment 2 Simon McVittie 2011-03-14 09:17:05 UTC
Comment on attachment 44373 [details] [review]
the patch

This documents the exec transport for Bug #35230. Could you attach the patch for systemd: instead, please? :-)
Comment 3 Simon McVittie 2011-03-14 09:21:34 UTC
OOI, is there any reason not to document the systemd LISTEN_FDS mini-protocol independently of sd itself? It seems like something that any inetd-like setup could use.
Comment 4 Lennart Poettering 2011-08-24 15:48:12 UTC
Created attachment 50555 [details] [review]
spec patch

Here's the right patch
Comment 5 Lennart Poettering 2011-08-24 15:50:13 UTC
(In reply to comment #3)
> OOI, is there any reason not to document the systemd LISTEN_FDS mini-protocol
> independently of sd itself? It seems like something that any inetd-like setup
> could use.

It's already documented here (see Notes):

http://0pointer.de/public/systemd-man/sd_listen_fds.html

I have reached out a couple of times to the Upstart folks regarding this, to get them commit to this spec but to no luck.
Comment 6 Lennart Poettering 2012-02-01 20:18:47 UTC
Created attachment 56492 [details] [review]
Rebased to current git
Comment 7 Simon McVittie 2012-02-10 07:04:08 UTC
Applied, thanks. 1.5.10


Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.