Bug 35757 - FILESAVE Dirty saving of a spreadsheet - Ms Jet engine reading problem
Summary: FILESAVE Dirty saving of a spreadsheet - Ms Jet engine reading problem
Status: RESOLVED INVALID
Alias: None
Product: LibreOffice
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Calc (show other bugs)
Version:
(earliest affected)
3.3.2 release
Hardware: Other Windows (All)
: medium normal
Assignee: Not Assigned
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2011-03-29 00:53 UTC by cianoz
Modified: 2012-08-31 10:05 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Crash report or crash signature:


Attachments
Calc file saved with LibO that can't be read correctly by Ms Jet engine (625.00 KB, application/vnd.ms-excel)
2011-03-29 00:53 UTC, cianoz
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description cianoz 2011-03-29 00:53:46 UTC
Created attachment 44982 [details]
Calc file saved with LibO that can't be read correctly by Ms Jet engine

Hello
We're using Business Objects for report creation and data analysis. It's a business intelligence software that reads data from a database and/or from an Excel file. If you use an Excel file as source it uses the Microsoft Jet engine to read data, AFAIK. 

To date I've used OpenOffice.org to edit the Excel file but recently I tried to switch to LibreOffice. But saving the Excel file with LibreOffice seems somehow to corrupt the data, because Business Objects now reads the most of cells as empty or zero. If i save the original file with OpenOffice (any recent version) it is read correctly by B.O./Jet engine.

I have difficult to provide more details, except than attaching the Excel file saved with LibO. As said, AFAIK, Business Objects uses the Jet engine to read data from Excel, that is the same engine used by Ms Access, at least until some years ago. You could try to reproduce the problem with Access.

The sheet used to read data from the Excel file is "Totale", that is filled with linked values from the other sheets.

I have 30+ users that I would to switch to LibO but problems like this are vital to decide the switch. 
Thank you

cianoz
Comment 1 Björn Michaelsen 2011-12-23 11:46:49 UTC
[This is an automated message.]
This bug was filed before the changes to Bugzilla on 2011-10-16. Thus it
started right out as NEW without ever being explicitly confirmed. The bug is
changed to state NEEDINFO for this reason. To move this bug from NEEDINFO back
to NEW please check if the bug still persists with the 3.5.0 beta1 or beta2 prereleases.
Details on how to test the 3.5.0 beta1 can be found at:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/BugHunting_Session_3.5.0.-1

more detail on this bulk operation: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/RFC-Operation-Spamzilla-tp3607474p3607474.html
Comment 2 Volker Merschmann 2012-06-06 13:55:56 UTC
Fixed typo in Summary
Comment 3 Florian Reisinger 2012-08-14 14:00:03 UTC
Dear bug submitter!

Due to the fact, that there are a lot of NEEDINFO bugs with no answer within the last six months, we close all of these bugs.

To keep this message short, more infos are available @ https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/NeedinfoClosure#Statement

Thanks for understanding and hopefully updating your bug, so that everything is prepared for developers to fix your problem.

Yours!

Florian
Comment 4 Florian Reisinger 2012-08-14 14:01:12 UTC
Dear bug submitter!

Due to the fact, that there are a lot of NEEDINFO bugs with no answer within the last six months, we close all of these bugs.

To keep this message short, more infos are available @ https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/NeedinfoClosure#Statement

Thanks for understanding and hopefully updating your bug, so that everything is prepared for developers to fix your problem.

Yours!

Florian
Comment 5 Florian Reisinger 2012-08-14 14:05:56 UTC
Dear bug submitter!

Due to the fact, that there are a lot of NEEDINFO bugs with no answer within the last six months, we close all of these bugs.

To keep this message short, more infos are available @ https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/NeedinfoClosure#Statement

Thanks for understanding and hopefully updating your bug, so that everything is prepared for developers to fix your problem.

Yours!

Florian
Comment 6 Florian Reisinger 2012-08-14 14:07:57 UTC
Dear bug submitter!

Due to the fact, that there are a lot of NEEDINFO bugs with no answer within the last six months, we close all of these bugs.

To keep this message short, more infos are available @ https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/NeedinfoClosure#Statement

Thanks for understanding and hopefully updating your bug, so that everything is prepared for developers to fix your problem.

Yours!

Florian