Bug 37467 - Test Bug For PulseAudio
Summary: Test Bug For PulseAudio
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: PulseAudio
Classification: Unclassified
Component: pavucontrol (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Hardware: Other All
: medium normal
Assignee: Arun Raghavan
QA Contact: pulseaudio-bugs
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2011-05-22 08:07 UTC by Colin Guthrie
Modified: 2011-06-22 01:33 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
i915 platform:
i915 features:


Attachments

Description Colin Guthrie 2011-05-22 08:07:19 UTC
Just a test.
Comment 1 Colin Guthrie 2011-06-12 11:38:45 UTC
Testy test tester testington.
Comment 2 Tanu Kaskinen 2011-06-12 12:27:03 UTC
I got the following mail:

    https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37467

    --- Comment #1 from Colin Guthrie <fdo@colin.guthr.ie> 2011-06-12 11:38:45 PDT ---
    Testy test tester testington.

    -- 
    Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
    ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
    You are the assignee for the bug.
    _______________________________________________
    pulseaudio-bugs mailing list
    pulseaudio-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
    http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/pulseaudio-bugs

I noted that the mail claimed that I was the assignee for the bug, but actually pulseaudio-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org is the assignee. Does the bug mailing list require all bugs to be assigned to the list? Can we assign bugs to any real people without breaking the mailing list?
Comment 3 Arun Raghavan 2011-06-12 13:38:25 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
[...]
> I noted that the mail claimed that I was the assignee for the bug, but actually
> pulseaudio-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org is the assignee. Does the bug mailing
> list require all bugs to be assigned to the list? Can we assign bugs to any
> real people without breaking the mailing list?

One easy way to find out.
Comment 4 Arun Raghavan 2011-06-12 13:38:41 UTC
Testalicious
Comment 5 Colin Guthrie 2011-06-12 15:00:26 UTC
So I guess that broke it sending to the list then :(

I guess we cannot do an "always CC" type thing?
Comment 6 Tanu Kaskinen 2011-06-12 21:56:56 UTC
There's the default CC feature that should work: http://www.bugzilla.org/releases/3.0/new-features.html#v30_feat_cc

I don't know how to configure default CC addresses, though. According to the documentation they can be specified when creating a component - if there's a way to edit a component after it's created, I'd expect the default CC list can be edited in the same place.
Comment 7 Colin Guthrie 2011-06-13 01:17:46 UTC
(In reply to comment #6)
> There's the default CC feature that should work:
> http://www.bugzilla.org/releases/3.0/new-features.html#v30_feat_cc
> 
> I don't know how to configure default CC addresses, though. According to the
> documentation they can be specified when creating a component - if there's a
> way to edit a component after it's created, I'd expect the default CC list can
> be edited in the same place.

Hmm, yeah maybe... But perhaps that doesn't happen when the address is the assignee too? Easy enough to fix if we just make a new alias for e.g. "newbugs(at)pulseaudio.org" and make it the default assignee.
Comment 8 Colin Guthrie 2011-06-13 01:18:30 UTC
Adding Tanu to the CC ;)
Comment 9 Arun Raghavan 2011-06-13 13:38:32 UTC
So do the components already have the pulseaudio-bugs ML on CC? I'd imagine it should deal with having the field in assignee and CC just fine.
Comment 10 Colin Guthrie 2011-06-14 02:21:52 UTC
I've asked here:

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38283
Comment 11 Colin Guthrie 2011-06-21 08:49:44 UTC
OK, so as per the above linked bug, Daniel has set the QA contact to the list. Therefore it should always get mails. This should include this ticket too I guess, so hopefully we will see it on the list even tho' the list is not in the CC list.
Comment 12 Colin Guthrie 2011-06-21 09:09:03 UTC
Resetting QA contact
Comment 13 Colin Guthrie 2011-06-21 09:10:00 UTC
Ahh now the QA contact is set up, the list should get all mails :)

I think we can close this bug now :D
Comment 14 Tanu Kaskinen 2011-06-21 09:21:09 UTC
(In reply to comment #13)
> Ahh now the QA contact is set up, the list should get all mails :)
> 
> I think we can close this bug now :D

How are we going to use the bug states beyond RESOLVED? Do we care about VERIFIED and CLOSED at all?
Comment 15 Arun Raghavan 2011-06-21 09:34:35 UTC
IMO we can just stick to having RESOLVED being the end of the bug since it keeps the flow simple. I'm not very fixed about this, though.
Comment 16 Tanu Kaskinen 2011-06-21 12:15:37 UTC
I also feel that RESOLVED is a good enough end point.
Comment 17 Colin Guthrie 2011-06-22 01:33:26 UTC
Agreed.


Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.