xorgcfg has been failing on xorg 6.8.2 and 6.8.99.15 with the same message: X Error of failed request: BadDrawable (invalid Pixmap or Window parameter) Major opcode of failed request: 53 (X_CreatePixmap) Resource id in failed request: 0x0 Serial number of failed request: 981 Current serial number in output stream: 982 I dived in my compiled xorg tree and recompiled the appropriate stuff with debugging enabled. Here is some a gdb session for illustration: Note: I stuck a "XSynchronize(XtDisplay(toplevel), TRUE);" after the initialization of toplevel. $ gdb xorgcfg GNU gdb 6.3 Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions. Type "show copying" to see the conditions. There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "x86_64-pc-linux-gnu"...Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1". (gdb) break 434 Breakpoint 1 at 0x4289b6: file interface.c, line 434. (gdb) run Starting program: /var/tmp/portage/xorg-x11-6.8.99.15/work/xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/xf86cfg/xorgcfg Breakpoint 1, main (argc=1, argv=0x7fffffc12ec8) at interface.c:435 435 XtRealizeWidget(toplevel); (gdb) n 436 XtRealizeWidget(topMenu); (gdb) p *(toplevel) $1 = {core = {self = 0x5edc90, widget_class = 0x2aaaab413e00, parent = 0x0, xrm_name = 167, being_destroyed = 0 '\0', destroy_callbacks = 0x5da180, constraints = 0x0, x = 0, y = 0, width = 320, height = 343, border_width = 1, managed = 0 '\0', sensitive = 1 '\001', ancestor_sensitive = 1 '\001', event_table = 0x5bfba0, tm = { translations = 0x5ee4e0, proc_table = 0x5ee4a0, current_state = 0x0, lastEventTime = 0}, accelerators = 0x0, border_pixel = 0, border_pixmap = 2, popup_list = 0x0, num_popups = 0, name = 0x5a9880 "xorgcfg", screen = 0x5b2500, colormap = 32, window = 0, depth = 35651765, background_pixel = 24, background_pixmap = 16777215, visible = 0 '\0', mapped_when_managed = 0 '\0'}} (gdb) p *(toplevel->core.screen) $2 = {ext_data = 0x0, display = 0x5ad570, root = 72, width = 0, height = 1600, mwidth = 1200, mheight = 383, ndepths = 288, depths = 0x7, root_depth = 5973392, root_visual = 0x18, default_gc = 0x5b2610, cmap = 5955920, white_pixel = 32, black_pixel = 16777215, max_maps = 0, min_maps = 0, backing_store = 1, save_unders = 1, root_input_mask = 0} (gdb) n 438 pixmap = XCreateBitmapFromData(XtDisplay(toplevel), XtWindow(toplevel), (gdb) X Error of failed request: BadDrawable (invalid Pixmap or Window parameter) Major opcode of failed request: 53 (X_CreatePixmap) Resource id in failed request: 0x0 Serial number of failed request: 983 Current serial number in output stream: 984 Program exited with code 01. (gdb) q Some points I'd like to make: - the following values (excerpted and given in their order in the structure) toplevel->core.screen->width = 0 toplevel->core.screen->height = 1600 toplevel->core.screen->mwidth = 1200 toplevel->core.screen->mheigth = 383 toplevel->core.screen->white_pixel = 32 toplevel->core.screen->black_pixel = 16777215 toplevel->core.screen->max_maps = 0 My desktop is running at 1600x1200 24bit color, but the width/height have obviously shifted one element lower. same goes for the values of white_pixel and black_pixel that seem to be assigned to the following element in the struct. toplevel->core.window = 0 toplevel->core.depth = 35651765 toplevel->core.background_pixel = 24 toplevel->core.background_pixmap = 16777215 core.window should definitely not be 0 after a XtRealize (hence the error), my *color depth* is 24 bits and that 0xFFFFFF seems like a likely value for background_pixel and not a background_pixmap Trying the same in a VNC desktop running at 1024x768 16bit color, I get similar results for the members of toplevel->core.screen: width = 0 height = 1024 mwidth = 768 mheight = 260 ... white_pixel = 33 black_pixel = 65535 max_maps = 0 My gcc is 3.4.3 -- the stable version distributed with Gentoo. Architecture is x86_64. Not sure what else you may need to know.
Sorry about the phenomenal bug spam, guys. Adding xorg-team@ to the QA contact so bugs don't get lost in future.
xorgcfg has been fixed by deletion from Xorg 1.6 & later.
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.