The "btc9000a" key definition in /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xkb/symbols/inet is wrong - the keys really output different codes. The bug is present both in xorg-x11-6.8.2 and in the latest version at http://cvs.freedesktop.org/xlibs/xkbdesc/symbols/inet?rev=1.11&view=markup . This is the working definition (if a 2.6.x kernel is used, the atkbd.softraw=0 boot parameter is required, otherwise the Help, XF86Start and XF86Eject keys don't work): partial alphanumeric_keys xkb_symbols "btc9000a" { name[Group1]= "BTC 9000A"; key <I5E> { [ XF86PowerOff ] }; key <I5F> { [ XF86Standby ] }; key <I63> { [ XF86WakeUp ] }; key <I25> { [ Help ] }; key <I66> { [ XF86Favorites ] }; key <I32> { [ XF86WWW ] }; key <I65> { [ XF86Search ] }; key <I26> { [ XF86Start ] }; key <I30> { [ XF86AudioRaiseVolume ] }; key <I2E> { [ XF86AudioLowerVolume ] }; key <I20> { [ XF86AudioMute ] }; key <I22> { [ XF86AudioPlay, XF86AudioPause ] }; key <I10> { [ XF86AudioPrev ] }; key <I19> { [ XF86AudioNext ] }; key <I24> { [ XF86AudioStop ] }; key <I33> { [ XF86Eject ] }; }; BTW, the codes are the same as in the "btc5090" definition, except the Help key, which is not present in btc5090.
Sergey, your description is VERY similar to BTC5090, as it is in the database now. Could you please check whether they are same or not (the only difference I see is "Help" key). Also, I just wonder - is the current btc9000a description suitable for any keyboard? I have doubts it appeared just out of the blue, probably there was some reason (which I'd be happy to find). Could you guess any?
Bugzilla Upgrade Mass Bug Change NEEDSINFO state was removed in Bugzilla 3.x, reopening any bugs previously listed as NEEDSINFO. - benjsc fd.o Wrangler
No answer, 3 years
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.