Bug 47664 - Remove mentions of Solaris
Summary: Remove mentions of Solaris
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: LibreOffice
Classification: Unclassified
Component: WWW (show other bugs)
Version:
(earliest affected)
3.5.0 release
Hardware: Other All
: medium normal
Assignee: Not Assigned
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2012-03-21 07:53 UTC by Fabian Rodriguez
Modified: 2012-08-21 06:19 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Crash report or crash signature:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Fabian Rodriguez 2012-03-21 07:53:44 UTC 
This URL still mentions Solaris, which may lead to believeing there is a Solaris build of LibreOffice:
http://www.libreoffice.org/welcome/readme/

All mentions of Solaris should be removed or appropriate action taken if there are plans to produce one (or not).
Comment 1 sasha.libreoffice 2012-06-14 04:15:15 UTC 
Thanks for bugreport
IMHO it mentioned for those people who prefer to compile from source.
Comment 2 Marc Pare 2012-08-10 08:09:55 UTC 
(In reply to comment #1)
> Thanks for bugreport
> IMHO it mentioned for those people who prefer to compile from source.

Yup, and devs are still working on patches for solaris[1]. 

Should this page be left as is? I am not sure it is linked from anywhere on the site and it still refers to LibreOffice 3.3 (see bottom of the page). 

We should perhaps mark this bug resolved.

Marc

[1] http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.libreoffice.devel/32640
Comment 3 beimaginativeegroup 2012-08-19 16:03:31 UTC 
Set as Confirmed. I tried to delete it as it is about 3.3 but I couldn't find it on Silverstripe. I hope some admin will look into this.
Comment 4 Marc Pare 2012-08-20 06:41:00 UTC 
(In reply to comment #3)
> Set as Confirmed. I tried to delete it as it is about 3.3 but I couldn't find
> it on Silverstripe. I hope some admin will look into this.

I have deleted the file HOWEVER, since then, I found that the page is referenced in the readme in the installer packages. The readme that I have for linux rpm is also partly outdated and references to the LibreOffice 3.3.

I believe what is happening is that the Windows/Linux/Apple readme's first few lines (in the content) are being relabelled with the newer version numbers, but the actual content as a whole has not been reviewed in a while (not since v.3.3 !!!).

I think all of the installer package readme's should be re-checked and updated after which we could republish the readme page on the site BUT I would prefer organizing it in a more rational page with redirection links to subpages (Windows-Apple-Linux) organized in a similar way as the download page [http://www.libreoffice.org/download/?nodetect].

I believe the original readme's were under the care of the documentation team. Does anybody know?

BTW ... the readme page was in the SilverStripe tree under "Thanks".

Cheers,

Marc
Comment 5 Rainer Bielefeld Retired 2012-08-21 06:19:34 UTC 
Fixed due to Comment 4