Bug 48028 - [Regression ILK]I-G-T/gem_tiled_blits fail
Summary: [Regression ILK]I-G-T/gem_tiled_blits fail
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: DRI
Classification: Unclassified
Component: DRM/Intel (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Hardware: Other All
: medium normal
Assignee: Daniel Vetter
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks: 40928
  Show dependency tree / graph
 
Reported: 2012-03-29 01:16 UTC by Guang Yang
Modified: 2017-10-06 14:50 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
i915 platform:
i915 features:

Attachments

Description Guang Yang 2012-03-29 01:16:32 UTC 
System Environment:
--------------------------
Platform:        ILK 
Kernel: (drm-intel-next-queued)e7e58eb5c0d1d7d1a42fcb2b5a247d28ec08b47e
Bug detailed description:
-------------------------
   On ILK platform ,running gem_tiled_blits of the
Intel-gpu-tools will fail.

  the error on the console is like this:
   not enough RAM to run test, reducing buffer count
   Using 1631 1MiB buffers
   Verifying initialisation...
   Cyclic blits, forward...
   Expected 0x00000000, found 0x15d40000 at offset 0x00000000
   Aborted (core dumped)

   Here is the GDB backtrace:
#0  0x00000037f7034085 in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#1  0x00000037f7035a36 in abort () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#2  0x00000000004016fc in check_bo (bo=0x60dd40, start_val=<value optimized out>) at gem_tiled_blits.c:112
#3  0x00000000004019b6 in main (argc=<value optimized out>, argv=<value optimized out>) at gem_tiled_blits.c:173

   Here is a good kernel commit:
Kernel: (drm-intel-next-queued)1d83f4426fa0555c98c989915be6df01a8125aca
   If have a demand,I can bisect it.
Comment 1 Daniel Vetter 2012-03-29 02:07:41 UTC 
*** Bug 48030 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 2 Daniel Vetter 2012-03-30 13:02:53 UTC 
This should be fixed by the following patch from -fixes:

commit 5d031e5b633d910f35e6e0abce94d9d842390006
Author: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Date:   Wed Feb 8 13:34:13 2012 +0000

    drm/i915: Remove use of the autoreported ringbuffer HEAD position
Comment 3 Guang Yang 2012-03-30 19:12:44 UTC 
confirmed, the bug has been fixed with -fixes branch.
Comment 4 Elizabeth 2017-10-06 14:50:38 UTC 
Closing old verified.

Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.