The following aborts, indicating a wrong implementation of GLX spec. This is minimized from failing startup of Rage under Wine. #include <GL/glx.h> #include <assert.h> int main() { int n; glXChooseFBConfig(XOpenDisplay(NULL), 0, (int[]){GLX_DRAWABLE_TYPE, GLX_DONT_CARE, 0}, &n); assert(n); }
Can you attach the output of glxinfo?
(In reply to comment #1) > Can you attach the output of glxinfo? I don't want to sound arrogant, but I fail to see how that would be relevant. In http://cgit.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/tree/src/glx/glxcmds.c, fbconfigs_compatible() fails to follow the GLX specification, which says: If GLX_DONT_CARE is specified as an attribute value, then the attribute will not be checked. MATCH_EXACT and MATCH_MASK don't check a->param for GLX_DONT_CARE.
Dupe of bug 47478 .
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 47478 ***
(In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > Can you attach the output of glxinfo? > > I don't want to sound arrogant, but I fail to see how that would be relevant. > > In http://cgit.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/tree/src/glx/glxcmds.c, > fbconfigs_compatible() fails to follow the GLX specification, which says: > > If GLX_DONT_CARE is specified as an attribute value, > then the attribute will not be checked. > > MATCH_EXACT and MATCH_MASK don't check a->param for GLX_DONT_CARE. There are three implementations of GLX in the Mesa tree: src/glx/ (for DRI drivers) src/mesa/drivers/x11/ (for legacy swrast) src/gallium/state_trackers/glx/xlib/ (for llvmpipe/softpipe) The output of glxinfo would tell me which one you're using.
Thanks for the explanation. I was talking, of course, about the first (DRI). I was assuming you ran the testcase and saw the failure.
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.