Bug 632 - Make 009.001 maintaince release not suck...
Summary: Make 009.001 maintaince release not suck...
Alias: None
Product: xprint
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Tracking (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All All
: high normal
Assignee: Roland Mainz
QA Contact:
Depends on: 451 456 552 608 633 680
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2004-05-17 11:19 UTC by Roland Mainz
Modified: 2011-09-13 13:31 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
i915 platform:
i915 features:


Description Roland Mainz 2004-05-17 11:19:27 UTC
Tracker bug for the 009-001 maintaince release (an extra step between 009 and
010 since the 010 version still has to "bake" on Xort trunk due new features
like OpenGL support and other nits).
Comment 1 Roland Mainz 2004-05-17 11:20:08 UTC
Adding bug 552 ("Xprint version 009 doesn't build w/ gcc-3.40") - already fixed
on oldcvs-trunk.
Comment 2 Roland Mainz 2004-05-17 11:22:32 UTC
Adding bug 451 ("/usr/share/fonts/ may not exist on a Linux installation").
Comment 3 Roland Mainz 2004-05-17 11:44:57 UTC
Adding bug 608 ("Can't print on Debian/CUPS due to error 'Xprt_64: lpr: unable
to print file: server-error-not-accepting-jobs'").
Comment 4 Drew Parsons 2004-05-26 23:46:16 UTC
Some minor Debian bugs might be worth addressing now.  They're just nit-picky
ones over text details:

"/etc/X11/Xsession.d/92xprint-xpserverlist refers to /usr/dt/config/Xsession.d/"

/etc/init.d/xprint looks for /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fs/config and complains when it
doesn't find it (but does start up Xprt anyway). /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fs/config
should be ignored (no warning) if it isn't there?

These other bugs might be safe to ignore, but I want to bring them to your
attention in case you know something I don't :) ...

Should /etc/init.d/xprint concern itself with /etc/X11/xfs/config? (which
doesn't seem to be supplied by any Debian package, we don't know why the report
has it on his system).

Reports that Xprt does not print without cupsys-bsd.  I haven't had time to test
this yet myself, but this was supposed to have been fixed in v0.9.  Together
with bug #250490, it's almost as if the v0.8 code has mysteriously got into the
Debian v0.9 package. But, "it works for me"....
Comment 5 Corbin Simpson 2011-09-13 13:31:45 UTC
Closing due to all of this bug's dependencies being closed. :3

Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.