Created attachment 99559 [details] dmesg ==System Environment== -------------------------- Regression: Yes. Here has another Bug 78685 before Non-working platforms: HSW ==kernel== -------------------------- -nightly: f5b0cca269ca3f7062f8d3441cebe6a16ce12be4(fails) -queued: e6a7e5d0fd778bc6cf295414b9937723091c9bb6(fails) Author: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Date: Wed May 21 17:29:31 2014 -0300 drm/i915: grab the audio power domain when enabling audio on HSW+ With the current code, we unconditionally touch HSW_AUD_PIN_ELD_CP_VLD, which means we can touch it when the power well is off, and that will trigger an "Unclaimed register" message. Just adding the intel_crtc->config.has_audio should already avoid the unclaimed register messsages, but since we actually need the power well to make the Audio code work, it makes sense to also grab the audio power domain reference, and release it when it's not needed anymore. I used IGT's pm_rpm to reproduce this bug, but it can probably be reproduced on other tests that do modesets. I'm using a machine with eDP+HDMI connected. Regression introduced by: commit acfa75b02e72bad7c93564ac379712e29c001432 Author: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Date: Thu Apr 24 23:54:51 2014 +0200 drm/i915: Simplify audio handling on DDI ports Credits to Daniel for suggesting this implementation. Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> -fixes: f93e94efebbe0b9ad5048076f171ea2b054ca4fb(fails) Author: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Date: Wed May 21 12:42:56 2014 +0100 drm/i915: Fix dynamic allocation of physical handles A single object may be referenced by multiple registers fundamentally breaking the static allotment of ids in the current design. When the object is used the second time, the physical address of the first assignment is relinquished and a second one granted. However, the hardware is still reading (and possibly writing) to the old physical address now returned to the system. Eventually hilarity will ensue, but in the short term, it just means that cursors are broken when using more than one pipe. v2: Fix up leak of pci handle when handling an error during attachment, and avoid a double kmap/kunmap. (Ville) Rebase against -fixes. v3: And fix the error handling added in v2 (Ville) Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77351 Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> ==Bug detailed description== ----------------------------- igt/gem_reset_stats/ban-render fails Output: ./gem_reset_stats --run-subtest ban-render IGT-Version: 1.6-gc75dcbd (x86_64) (Linux: 3.15.0-rc5_drm-intel-fixes_f93e94_20140522+ x86_64) retrying for ban (9) retrying for ban (8) retrying for ban (7) retrying for ban (6) retrying for ban (5) retrying for ban (4) retrying for ban (3) retrying for ban (2) retrying for ban (1) retrying for ban (0) Test assertion failure function test_ban, file gem_reset_stats.c:572: Last errno: 0, Success Failed assertion: h4 == -EIO Subtest ban-render: FAIL ==Reproduce steps== ---------------------------- 1. ./gem_reset_stats --run-subtest ban-render
If this is a regression, did we bisect it? Which one is the bad commit?
The test was pass on latest -next-queued(9c33baa6b3bbb01c1a88dceba986b20e6642cf31), and the bad commit was pass too. Output: [root@x-hsw27 tests]# ./gem_reset_stats --run-subtest ban-render IGT-Version: 1.7-gfedb9b6 (x86_64) (Linux: 3.15.0-rc8_drm-intel-next-queued_9c33ba_20140625+ x86_64) Subtest ban-render: SUCCESS
This bug unable to reproduce on latest -nightly(a7665faa31dbbbae25e376508a9b3781e25d09e2). Maybe we can close it. Output: [root@x-hsw24 tests]# ./gem_reset_stats --run-subtest ban-render IGT-Version: 1.7-g67e29a3 (x86_64) (Linux: 3.16.0-rc2_drm-intel-nightly_a7665f_20140701+ x86_64) Subtest ban-render: SUCCESS
(In reply to comment #3) > This bug unable to reproduce on latest > -nightly(a7665faa31dbbbae25e376508a9b3781e25d09e2). Maybe we can close it. Ok, closing, please reopen if the problem reappears. Thanks.
(In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > This bug unable to reproduce on latest > > -nightly(a7665faa31dbbbae25e376508a9b3781e25d09e2). Maybe we can close it. > > Ok, closing, please reopen if the problem reappears. Thanks. Verified on latest -nightly(2a38e1bcd4dc9523cd723291340226d139bece1b)
Closing verified+worksforme.
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.