Bug 82102 - 4k monitor edid rejected: EDID timing clock 297.00 exceeds claimed max 115MHz, fixing
Summary: 4k monitor edid rejected: EDID timing clock 297.00 exceeds claimed max 115MHz...
Status: RESOLVED MOVED
Alias: None
Product: xorg
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Driver/Radeon (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) Linux (All)
: medium major
Assignee: xf86-video-ati maintainers
QA Contact: Xorg Project Team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2014-08-03 22:09 UTC by Wolfgang Rupprecht
Modified: 2019-11-19 07:47 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
i915 platform:
i915 features:


Attachments
Xorg.log file for failed Seiki 4k monitor config (64.32 KB, text/plain)
2014-08-03 22:09 UTC, Wolfgang Rupprecht
no flags Details
Xorg.log of xorg-server-1.16.0 (167.77 KB, text/plain)
2014-08-30 15:22 UTC, Victor Mustya
no flags Details
Xorg.0.log Radeon HD 7770, X.Org X Server 1.14.4 (74.04 KB, text/plain)
2014-09-11 22:53 UTC, Wolfgang Rupprecht
no flags Details

Description Wolfgang Rupprecht 2014-08-03 22:09:27 UTC
Created attachment 103947 [details]
Xorg.log file for failed Seiki 4k monitor config

The EDID-provided modeline is rejected resulting in X refusing to display at 3840x2160.   Xorg.log appended.

[ 32278.200] (WW) EDID timing clock 297.00 exceeds claimed max 115MHz, fixing
[ 32278.200] (II) RADEON(0): EDID vendor "SEK", prod id 0
[ 32278.200] (II) RADEON(0): Using EDID range info for horizontal sync
[ 32278.200] (II) RADEON(0): Using EDID range info for vertical refresh
[ 32278.200] (II) RADEON(0): Printing DDC gathered Modelines:
[ 32278.200] (II) RADEON(0): Modeline "3840x2160"x0.0  297.00  3840 4016 4104 4400  2160 2168 2178 2250 +hsync +vsync (67.5 kHz eP)

version info:

X.Org X Server 1.14.4
Release Date: 2013-10-31
[ 32277.200] X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0
[ 32277.200] Build Operating System:  3.14.3-200.fc20.x86_64 
[ 32277.200] Current Operating System: Linux capsicum.wsrcc.com 3.15.7-200.fc20.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Jul 28 18:50:26 UTC 2014 x86_64
[ 32277.200] Kernel command line: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.15.7-200.fc20.x86_64 root=UUID=3c236a66-0454-4b98-b7a0-e799da93684c ro iommu=allowed,memaper=5 radeon.audio=1 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
[ 32277.201] Build Date: 27 June 2014  01:35:28AM
[ 32277.201] Build ID: xorg-x11-server 1.14.4-11.fc20 
[ 32277.201] Current version of pixman: 0.30.0
Comment 1 Wolfgang Rupprecht 2014-08-03 22:21:23 UTC
Just to add a bit of context and why this is an important fix: this is a $340 39" 3840x2160 @ 30hz (100 DPI) monitor.   All the X developers should be running this.  At $340 it is cheaper than a lot of crappy monitors of much smaller size both physically and pixel-wise.  Given the incorrect dot-clock checking in X, the refresh is limited to around 13 hz. That sucks.  

Oh, yea, and a buddy that runs that OS from Redmond says it works at 3840x2160 @ 30hz for him with no futzing around needed.
Comment 2 Chris Wilson 2014-08-04 06:32:36 UTC
Have you considered testing a later Xserver? In particular, 4k support requires

commit d6c8d7509727060b8e2358b9ed1c0e17b2ec3401
Author: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Date:   Wed Jul 31 19:16:45 2013 +0100

    xfree86: Use the TMDS maximum frequency to prune modes
    
    Instead of only relying on the Range section, we can do better on
    HDMI to find out what is the max dot clock the monitor supports. The
    HDMI CEA vendor block adds a TMDS max freq we can use.
    
    This makes X not prune 4k resolutions on HDMI.
    
    v2: Replace X_INFO by X_PROBED in the message that prints the max
        TMDS frequency (Chris Wilson)
    
    Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
    Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>

which is xorg-server-1.16.0
Comment 3 Victor Mustya 2014-08-30 15:21:22 UTC
I have the same issue with xorg-server-1.16.0, linux kernel 3.16.1 and the same hardware:

[    42.483] 
X.Org X Server 1.16.0
Release Date: 2014-07-16
[    42.483] X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0
[    42.483] Build Operating System: Linux 3.16.1-gentoo x86_64 Gentoo
[    42.483] Current Operating System: Linux workstation 3.16.1-gentoo #1 SMP PREEMPT Sat Aug 30 17:59:24 MSK 2014 x86_64
[    42.483] Kernel command line: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/kernel-genkernel-x86_64-3.16.1-gentoo root=/dev/mapper/system-gentoo ro dolvm net.ifnames=0
[    42.483] Build Date: 30 August 2014  06:53:00PM
...
[    57.792] (WW) EDID timing clock 297.00 exceeds claimed max 115MHz, fixing
[    57.792] (II) RADEON(0): EDID vendor "SEK", prod id 0
[    57.792] (II) RADEON(0): Using EDID range info for horizontal sync
[    57.792] (II) RADEON(0): Using EDID range info for vertical refresh
[    57.792] (II) RADEON(0): Printing DDC gathered Modelines:
[    57.792] (II) RADEON(0): Modeline "3840x2160"x0.0  297.00  3840 4016 4104 4400  2160 2168 2178 2250 +hsync +vsync (67.5 kHz eP)
[    57.792] (II) RADEON(0): Modeline "1440x900"x0.0  106.50  1440 1520 1672 1904  900 903 909 934 -hsync +vsync (55.9 kHz e)
[    57.792] (II) RADEON(0): Modeline "720x576"x0.0   27.00  720 732 796 864  576 581 586 625 -hsync -vsync (31.2 kHz e)
[    57.792] (II) RADEON(0): Modeline "1920x1080i"x0.0   74.25  1920 2008 2052 2200  1080 1084 1094 1125 interlace +hsync +vsync (33.8 kHz e)
[    57.792] (II) RADEON(0): Modeline "1920x1080i"x0.0   74.25  1920 2448 2492 2640  1080 1084 1094 1125 interlace +hsync +vsync (28.1 kHz e)
[    57.792] (II) RADEON(0): Modeline "1280x720"x0.0   74.25  1280 1720 1760 1980  720 725 730 750 +hsync +vsync (37.5 kHz e)
[    57.792] (II) RADEON(0): Modeline "800x600"x0.0   40.00  800 840 968 1056  600 601 605 628 +hsync +vsync (37.9 kHz e)
[    57.792] (II) RADEON(0): Modeline "640x480"x0.0   31.50  640 656 720 840  480 481 484 500 -hsync -vsync (37.5 kHz e)
[    57.792] (II) RADEON(0): Modeline "640x480"x0.0   31.50  640 664 704 832  480 489 492 520 -hsync -vsync (37.9 kHz e)
[    57.792] (II) RADEON(0): Modeline "640x480"x0.0   25.18  640 656 752 800  480 490 492 525 -hsync -vsync (31.5 kHz e)
[    57.792] (II) RADEON(0): Modeline "720x400"x0.0   28.32  720 738 846 900  400 412 414 449 -hsync +vsync (31.5 kHz e)
[    57.792] (II) RADEON(0): Modeline "1024x768"x0.0   78.75  1024 1040 1136 1312  768 769 772 800 +hsync +vsync (60.0 kHz e)
[    57.792] (II) RADEON(0): Modeline "1024x768"x0.0   75.00  1024 1048 1184 1328  768 771 777 806 -hsync -vsync (56.5 kHz e)
[    57.792] (II) RADEON(0): Modeline "1024x768"x0.0   65.00  1024 1048 1184 1344  768 771 777 806 -hsync -vsync (48.4 kHz e)
[    57.792] (II) RADEON(0): Modeline "800x600"x0.0   49.50  800 816 896 1056  600 601 604 625 +hsync +vsync (46.9 kHz e)
[    57.792] (II) RADEON(0): Modeline "800x600"x0.0   50.00  800 856 976 1040  600 637 643 666 +hsync +vsync (48.1 kHz e)
[    57.792] (II) RADEON(0): Modeline "1280x960"x0.0  108.00  1280 1376 1488 1800  960 961 964 1000 +hsync +vsync (60.0 kHz e)
[    57.792] (II) RADEON(0): Modeline "1440x480i"x0.0   27.00  1440 1478 1602 1716  480 488 494 525 interlace -hsync -vsync (15.7 kHz e)
[    57.792] (II) RADEON(0): Modeline "1440x240"x0.0   27.00  1440 1478 1602 1716  240 244 247 262 -hsync -vsync (15.7 kHz e)
[    57.792] (II) RADEON(0): Modeline "720x480"x0.0   27.00  720 736 798 858  480 489 495 525 -hsync -vsync (31.5 kHz e)
[    57.792] (II) RADEON(0): Modeline "1280x720"x0.0   74.25  1280 1390 1430 1650  720 725 730 750 +hsync +vsync (45.0 kHz e)
[    57.792] (II) RADEON(0): Modeline "1440x576i"x0.0   27.00  1440 1464 1590 1728  576 580 586 625 interlace -hsync -vsync (15.6 kHz e)
[    57.792] (II) RADEON(0): Modeline "1440x288"x0.0   27.00  1440 1464 1590 1728  288 290 293 312 -hsync -vsync (15.6 kHz e)
[    57.792] (II) RADEON(0): Modeline "1920x1080"x0.0   74.25  1920 2558 2602 2750  1080 1084 1089 1125 +hsync +vsync (27.0 kHz e)
[    57.792] (II) RADEON(0): Modeline "1920x1080"x0.0   74.25  1920 2448 2492 2640  1080 1084 1089 1125 +hsync +vsync (28.1 kHz e)
[    57.792] (--) RADEON(0): HDMI max TMDS frequency 300000KHz
...

My videocard is Radeon HD6870, display is SEIKI SE39UY04
Comment 4 Victor Mustya 2014-08-30 15:22:46 UTC
Created attachment 105471 [details]
Xorg.log of xorg-server-1.16.0
Comment 5 George Emigh 2014-08-30 19:54:53 UTC
Kernel 3.16.1
xorg-server 1.16.0
xf86-video-ati 7.4.0

Same error:

[    33.451] (II) RADEON(0): EDID for output DisplayPort-0
[    33.524] (WW) EDID timing clock 297.00 exceeds claimed max 115MHz, fixing
[    33.524] (II) RADEON(0): EDID for output HDMI-0
[    33.524] (II) RADEON(0): EDID Version: 1.3
[    33.524] (II) RADEON(0): Number of EDID sections to follow: 1
[    33.524] (II) RADEON(0): EDID (in hex):
[    33.538] (II) RADEON(0): EDID for output DVI-0
[    36.232] (WW) EDID timing clock 297.00 exceeds claimed max 115MHz, fixing
[    36.232] (II) RADEON(0): EDID vendor "SEK", prod id 0
[    36.245] (II) RADEON(0): Using EDID range info for horizontal sync
[    36.245] (II) RADEON(0): Using EDID range info for vertical refresh
[   311.742] (WW) EDID timing clock 297.00 exceeds claimed max 115MHz, fixing
[   311.742] (II) RADEON(0): EDID vendor "SEK", prod id 0
[   311.824] (WW) EDID timing clock 297.00 exceeds claimed max 115MHz, fixing
[   311.824] (II) RADEON(0): EDID vendor "SEK", prod id 0
[   311.906] (WW) EDID timing clock 297.00 exceeds claimed max 115MHz, fixing
[   311.906] (II) RADEON(0): EDID vendor "SEK", prod id 0
[   316.072] (WW) EDID timing clock 297.00 exceeds claimed max 115MHz, fixing
[   316.072] (II) RADEON(0): EDID vendor "SEK", prod id 0
[   320.019] (WW) EDID timing clock 297.00 exceeds claimed max 115MHz, fixing
[   320.019] (II) RADEON(0): EDID vendor "SEK", prod id 0
[   335.174] (WW) EDID timing clock 297.00 exceeds claimed max 115MHz, fixing
[   335.174] (II) RADEON(0): EDID vendor "SEK", prod id 0
Comment 6 Alex Deucher 2014-09-08 01:56:41 UTC
You GPU does not support 4k over HDMI.
Comment 7 Wolfgang Rupprecht 2014-09-08 15:05:09 UTC
(In reply to comment #6)
> You GPU does not support 4k over HDMI.

I assume this was meant for someone else.  My GPU is the Radeon 6450 (card: Sapphire Radeon HD 6450 1 GB DDR3 HDMI/DVI-D/VGA PCI-Express Graphics Card 100322L)

The specs at AMD claim this GPU does HDMI 1.4a 2 lanes of 340 Mhz dot clock each for a total of 640 Mhz.   Even if only one lane is populated on this card, that should still be 340 Mhz.   The modeline only asks for 297 Mhz.

As for the framebuffer size, xrandr claims this card does a 16k x 16k virtual buffer.  That too is enough for the  3840 x 2160 screen.   In fact the card works just fine at 15hz (as evidenced below).   In fact I'm typing this bug report at 3840x2160@15.00.

[wolfgang@capsicum ~]$ xrandr
Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 3840 x 2160, maximum 16384 x 16384
HDMI-0 connected primary 3840x2160+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 854mm x 481mm
   3840x2160_15.00  14.99* 
   1920x1080     60.00    50.00    59.94    24.00    23.98  
   1920x1080i    60.00    50.00    59.94  
   1440x900      59.89  
   1280x960      60.00  
   1280x720      60.00    50.00    59.94  
   1440x576i     50.00  
   1024x768      75.08    70.07    60.00  
   1440x480i     60.00    59.94  
   800x600       72.19    75.00    60.32  
   720x576       50.00  
   720x480       60.00    59.94  
   640x480       75.00    72.81    60.00    59.94  
   720x400       70.08  
DVI-0 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)
VGA-0 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis)
[wolfgang@capsicum ~]$ 

If there is some document describing how to compile up the current Xorg I'd be willing to give it a shot.   The world seems to have gotten more complicated since the days of old when a "make world; make install" sufficed.
Comment 8 Roland Scheidegger 2014-09-08 16:04:16 UTC
(In reply to comment #7)
> (In reply to comment #6)
> > You GPU does not support 4k over HDMI.
> The specs at AMD claim this GPU does HDMI 1.4a 2 lanes of 340 Mhz dot clock
> each for a total of 640 Mhz.   Even if only one lane is populated on this
> card, that should still be 340 Mhz.   The modeline only asks for 297 Mhz.
Where to they claim that? I think you've been successfully fooled by the HDMI forum, which allows anyone to implement some boring subfeatures noone is interested in and leave out the only thing important, namely higher frequencies, and still claiming newer standards (1.4 in this case) compliance regardless (for receiver devices which don't have such a high resolution this actually even makes sense). But don't worry AMD isn't the only one with "hdmi 1.4" and not supporting higher frequencies. In fact AMD clearly states max resolution over hdmi is 1920x1200. http://www.amd.com/en-gb/products/graphics/desktop/6000/6450# unless you've found some other doc...
And yes low refresh rates are always a way around that, I think it's typically not mentioned because it may not work (some monitors really might not like it).
Comment 9 Wolfgang Rupprecht 2014-09-08 16:37:55 UTC
(In reply to comment #8)
> (In reply to comment #7)
> > (In reply to comment #6)
> > > You GPU does not support 4k over HDMI.
> > The specs at AMD claim this GPU does HDMI 1.4a 2 lanes of 340 Mhz dot clock
> > each for a total of 640 Mhz.   Even if only one lane is populated on this
> > card, that should still be 340 Mhz.   The modeline only asks for 297 Mhz.
> Where to they claim that? I think you've been successfully fooled by the
> HDMI forum, which allows anyone to implement some boring subfeatures noone
> is interested in and leave out the only thing important, namely higher
> frequencies, and still claiming newer standards (1.4 in this case)
> compliance regardless (for receiver devices which don't have such a high
> resolution this actually even makes sense).

The spec sheet at the URL you quote below mentions HDMI 1.4a.   Although I can see how they might be skirting the truth about HDMI 1.4 compliance.

Are there any GPU's and/or cards that are known to display 4k at 30hz or above under X?
Comment 10 Alex Deucher 2014-09-08 16:41:32 UTC
(In reply to comment #9)
> Are there any GPU's and/or cards that are known to display 4k at 30hz or
> above under X?

Your card is DCE5 which supports 4k over displayport only.  DCE6 and newer (SI family and newer; Radeon HD 7xxx and newer in marking parlance) support 4k over HDMI.
Comment 11 Roland Scheidegger 2014-09-08 17:19:52 UTC
(In reply to comment #9)
> (In reply to comment #8)
> > (In reply to comment #7)
> > > (In reply to comment #6)
> > > > You GPU does not support 4k over HDMI.
> > > The specs at AMD claim this GPU does HDMI 1.4a 2 lanes of 340 Mhz dot clock
> > > each for a total of 640 Mhz.   Even if only one lane is populated on this
> > > card, that should still be 340 Mhz.   The modeline only asks for 297 Mhz.
> > Where to they claim that? I think you've been successfully fooled by the
> > HDMI forum, which allows anyone to implement some boring subfeatures noone
> > is interested in and leave out the only thing important, namely higher
> > frequencies, and still claiming newer standards (1.4 in this case)
> > compliance regardless (for receiver devices which don't have such a high
> > resolution this actually even makes sense).
> 
> The spec sheet at the URL you quote below mentions HDMI 1.4a.   Although I
> can see how they might be skirting the truth about HDMI 1.4 compliance.
1.4a only added some 3d formats (frame packing), but only with resolutions which you can do with "old" frequencies (1080p24 x2 and similar). hdmi 1.3 (!) was actually the new version which introduced the higher frequencies, though I think devices claiming to only be hdmi 1.3 compliant actually supporting the higher frequencies were very, very rare (if they even exist). It is possible supporting these was mandatory with 1.4b (cause it introduced 1080p60 x2) but I wouldn't bet on it neither.
Similarly, there's now "HDMI 2.0" devices out there which only support 4k with 30Hz and not 60Hz (or more specifically, 340Mhz frequency instead of 600Mhz). All the same old story.
Comment 12 George Emigh 2014-09-08 18:47:53 UTC
My video card clams 4K on HDMI. and my Seiki SE39UY04 is connected via HDMI.

01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] Cape Verde PRO [Radeon HD 7750 / R7 250E]

http://xfxforce.com/en-us/products/amd-radeon-hd-7700-series/amd-radeon-hd-7750-core-edition-fx-775a-znp4

I see this in the log, but right or wrong the display seems to function, so don't know if it matters or not.

 # cat /var/log/Xorg.0.log | grep EDID
[    35.631] (II) RADEON(0): EDID for output DisplayPort-0
[    35.710] (WW) EDID timing clock 297.00 exceeds claimed max 115MHz, fixing
[    35.710] (II) RADEON(0): EDID for output HDMI-0
[    35.710] (II) RADEON(0): EDID Version: 1.3
[    35.710] (II) RADEON(0): Number of EDID sections to follow: 1
[    35.710] (II) RADEON(0): EDID (in hex):
[    35.724] (II) RADEON(0): EDID for output DVI-0
[    38.058] (WW) EDID timing clock 297.00 exceeds claimed max 115MHz, fixing
[    38.058] (II) RADEON(0): EDID vendor "SEK", prod id 0
[    38.077] (II) RADEON(0): Using EDID range info for horizontal sync
[    38.077] (II) RADEON(0): Using EDID range info for vertical refresh
[   638.635] (WW) EDID timing clock 297.00 exceeds claimed max 115MHz, fixing
[   638.635] (II) RADEON(0): EDID vendor "SEK", prod id 0
[  2594.730] (WW) EDID timing clock 297.00 exceeds claimed max 115MHz, fixing
[  2594.730] (II) RADEON(0): EDID vendor "SEK", prod id 0
[  2599.692] (WW) EDID timing clock 297.00 exceeds claimed max 115MHz, fixing
[  2599.692] (II) RADEON(0): EDID vendor "SEK", prod id 0
[  2600.093] (WW) EDID timing clock 297.00 exceeds claimed max 115MHz, fixing
[  2600.093] (II) RADEON(0): EDID vendor "SEK", prod id 0
[  2600.185] (WW) EDID timing clock 297.00 exceeds claimed max 115MHz, fixing
[  2600.185] (II) RADEON(0): EDID vendor "SEK", prod id 0
[  2600.267] (WW) EDID timing clock 297.00 exceeds claimed max 115MHz, fixing
[  2600.267] (II) RADEON(0): EDID vendor "SEK", prod id 0
[  2600.350] (WW) EDID timing clock 297.00 exceeds claimed max 115MHz, fixing
[  2600.350] (II) RADEON(0): EDID vendor "SEK", prod id 0
[  2600.431] (WW) EDID timing clock 297.00 exceeds claimed max 115MHz, fixing
[  2600.431] (II) RADEON(0): EDID vendor "SEK", prod id 0
[  2600.514] (WW) EDID timing clock 297.00 exceeds claimed max 115MHz, fixing
[  2600.514] (II) RADEON(0): EDID vendor "SEK", prod id 0
[  2600.657] (WW) EDID timing clock 297.00 exceeds claimed max 115MHz, fixing
[  2600.657] (II) RADEON(0): EDID vendor "SEK", prod id 0
[  2620.010] (WW) EDID timing clock 297.00 exceeds claimed max 115MHz, fixing
[  2620.010] (II) RADEON(0): EDID vendor "SEK", prod id 0
[  2621.270] (WW) EDID timing clock 297.00 exceeds claimed max 115MHz, fixing
[  2621.270] (II) RADEON(0): EDID vendor "SEK", prod id 0
[  2621.353] (WW) EDID timing clock 297.00 exceeds claimed max 115MHz, fixing
[  2621.353] (II) RADEON(0): EDID vendor "SEK", prod id 0
[  2621.436] (WW) EDID timing clock 297.00 exceeds claimed max 115MHz, fixing
[  2621.436] (II) RADEON(0): EDID vendor "SEK", prod id 0
Comment 13 Victor Mustya 2014-09-11 19:09:34 UTC
My hardware (Radeon HD6870, display SEIKI SE39UY04) works at 3840x2160@30Hz over HDMI under Windows 7. If it does not work under Linux, it is a driver issue.
Comment 14 Wolfgang Rupprecht 2014-09-11 22:45:15 UTC
(In reply to comment #10)
> (In reply to comment #9)
> > Are there any GPU's and/or cards that are known to display 4k at 30hz or
> > above under X?
> 
> Your card is DCE5 which supports 4k over displayport only.  DCE6 and newer
> (SI family and newer; Radeon HD 7xxx and newer in marking parlance) support
> 4k over HDMI.

Thank you!  I got a Radeon HD 7770 card and it comes up at 3840x2160 @ 30.00 hz, which is all the Seiki 4k display will do.

As mentioned in comment 12, the error "(WW) EDID timing clock 297.00 exceeds claimed max 115MHz, fixing" is still logged, but the card does get configured with the 297 Mhz dot-clock, because it does display 4k at 30hz (according to the on-screen data displayed by the Seiki monitor.)
Comment 15 Wolfgang Rupprecht 2014-09-11 22:53:10 UTC
Created attachment 106159 [details]
Xorg.0.log Radeon HD 7770, X.Org X Server 1.14.4

Monitor correctly comes up at the full 3840x2160 30 hz rate, but the gripe about a too high a dot clock persists.

 [     6.208] (WW) EDID timing clock 297.00 exceeds claimed max 115MHz, fixing
Comment 16 Alex Deucher 2014-09-11 22:54:10 UTC
(In reply to comment #15)
> Created attachment 106159 [details]
> Xorg.0.log Radeon HD 7770, X.Org X Server 1.14.4
> 
> Monitor correctly comes up at the full 3840x2160 30 hz rate, but the gripe
> about a too high a dot clock persists.
> 
>  [     6.208] (WW) EDID timing clock 297.00 exceeds claimed max 115MHz,
> fixing

That message is from the xserver, not the driver.
Comment 17 D. Hugh Redelmeier 2014-10-01 06:31:14 UTC
I too have this monitor.

I too get "(WW) EDID timing clock 297.00 exceeds claimed max 115MHz, fixing"

I'm running "X.Org X Server 1.14.4" that is the latest version with Fedora 20.

I have no idea if the Intel video can handle 3840x2160@30Hz.  The processor is Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 857.  But nothing in the Xorg.0.log seems like a complaint from the intel driver (i.e prefixed with "intel(0)").

PS: Hi, Wolfgang.  Our paths cross in another bz entry.

Even if this isn't a bug, I suggest the message I got be changed to indicate the source of the claimed maximum 115MHz -- I have no idea where that limit comes from.

Also, if a driver trims modelines because of limitations, surely it should log that fact.
Comment 18 Martin Peres 2019-11-19 07:47:30 UTC
-- GitLab Migration Automatic Message --

This bug has been migrated to freedesktop.org's GitLab instance and has been closed from further activity.

You can subscribe and participate further through the new bug through this link to our GitLab instance: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/driver/xf86-video-ati/issues/108.


Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.