<drago01> poettering: why don't we have bash completion for "systemctl start $something" where $something is not enabled? <poettering> drago01: good question <drago01> poettering: its not really a big deal but annoying and somehow arbitary <poettering> drago01: we should fix that <poettering> drago01: initially we didn't have a nice way to enumerate non-enabled services <poettering> drago01: we now have that (and since a long time) <poettering> drago01: hence we really should add that <drago01> poettering: ok <poettering> drago01: would be great to file a bug about this on fdo! <drago01> poettering: ok let me do that <poettering> just an RFE, asking to use "systemctl list-unit-files" in addition to "systemctl list-units" for the completion list <poettering> (you want both, since for many cases l-u-f won't get you any service instances, only the templates...)
Should be fixed by Zbigniew already in 216. Is this with an earlier version? http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd/commit/?id=c6a373a2634854
Oh OK. Yeah I am still on F20 so running 208.
I think I fucked up the commit, at least the part for __get_startable_units.
Should be fixed with http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd/commit/?id=f29c77bc01.
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.