Bug 87772 - [965GM kms] wrong connector dpms state
Summary: [965GM kms] wrong connector dpms state
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: DRI
Classification: Unclassified
Component: DRM/Intel (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) Linux (All)
: medium normal
Assignee: Intel GFX Bugs mailing list
QA Contact: Intel GFX Bugs mailing list
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2014-12-27 19:37 UTC by maliktunga
Modified: 2017-07-24 22:49 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
i915 platform:
i915 features:


Attachments
dmesg output with drm.debug=14 (226.59 KB, text/plain)
2015-01-02 20:18 UTC, maliktunga
no flags Details
dmesg log immediately after a successful resume from suspend (238.80 KB, text/plain)
2015-01-14 19:08 UTC, maliktunga
no flags Details
Screenshot 1 of glitchy graphics (704.78 KB, image/png)
2015-01-14 19:09 UTC, maliktunga
no flags Details
Screenshot 2 of glitchy graphics (697.01 KB, image/png)
2015-01-14 19:10 UTC, maliktunga
no flags Details
Screenshot 3 of glitchy graphics (1.09 MB, image/png)
2015-01-14 19:11 UTC, maliktunga
no flags Details
Screenshot 4 of glitchy graphics (784.88 KB, image/png)
2015-01-14 19:12 UTC, maliktunga
no flags Details
Screenshot 5 of glitchy graphics (13.72 KB, image/png)
2015-01-14 19:12 UTC, maliktunga
no flags Details
Screenshot 6 of glitchy graphics (28.65 KB, image/png)
2015-01-14 19:13 UTC, maliktunga
no flags Details

Description maliktunga 2014-12-27 19:37:19 UTC
Here is a sample of my dmesg just after log in: http://fpaste.org/163276/

As pointed out on Google+ (https://plus.google.com/106350121860084674477/posts/WUtZZAirnfn), the first trace on line 901 is 'CPU: 0 PID: 1127 Comm: Xorg.bin Not tainted 3.17.7-300.fc21.x86_64 #1' while the others are 'CPU: 0 PID: 1127 Comm: Xorg.bin Tainted: G        W      3.17.7-300.fc21.x86_64 #1'. In between, there is a warning on line 922: 'WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1127 at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c:5034 intel_modeset_check_state+0x6ec/0x7b0 [i915]()'

I use Fedora 21 64-bit.
Processor: Intel® Pentium(R) Dual CPU T2390 @ 1.86GHz × 2
Graphics: Intel® 965GM
GNOME Shell 3.14.2
Kernel: 3.17.7-300.fc21.x86_64
Comment 1 Jani Nikula 2015-01-02 07:49:50 UTC
Please reproduce with drm.debug=14 module parameter set, and attach the dmesg to this bug.
Comment 2 maliktunga 2015-01-02 18:35:09 UTC
(In reply to Jani Nikula from comment #1)
> Please reproduce with drm.debug=14 module parameter set, and attach the
> dmesg to this bug.

I followed the instructions someone gave me on Google+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/+GillesPhilippeMorin/posts/U97jqTzjf2T

Here is the output right after login: http://fpaste.org/165045/02235791/

Is that what you wanted?
Comment 3 maliktunga 2015-01-02 20:18:26 UTC
Created attachment 111671 [details]
dmesg output with drm.debug=14

As asked by Jani Nikula.
Comment 4 maliktunga 2015-01-14 19:07:20 UTC
I don't know if that is related, but Xorg also often fails to load at wake after suspend. The cursor and keyboard work, though, and opening a new TTY too.

Also, graphics sometimes get glitchy too. I'll attach a few screenshots.
Comment 5 maliktunga 2015-01-14 19:08:36 UTC
Created attachment 112243 [details]
dmesg log immediately after a successful resume from suspend

I get warning messages even when the resume succeeds.
Comment 6 maliktunga 2015-01-14 19:09:59 UTC
Created attachment 112245 [details]
Screenshot 1 of glitchy graphics
Comment 7 maliktunga 2015-01-14 19:10:47 UTC
Created attachment 112246 [details]
Screenshot 2 of glitchy graphics
Comment 8 maliktunga 2015-01-14 19:11:33 UTC
Created attachment 112247 [details]
Screenshot 3 of glitchy graphics
Comment 9 maliktunga 2015-01-14 19:12:04 UTC
Created attachment 112248 [details]
Screenshot 4 of glitchy graphics
Comment 10 maliktunga 2015-01-14 19:12:48 UTC
Created attachment 112249 [details]
Screenshot 5 of glitchy graphics
Comment 11 maliktunga 2015-01-14 19:13:51 UTC
Created attachment 112250 [details]
Screenshot 6 of glitchy graphics
Comment 12 Jesse Barnes 2015-03-30 22:04:06 UTC
Can you file a separate bug for the corruption issue?  Do both of these issues still happen with current code?
Comment 13 maliktunga 2015-03-30 22:38:24 UTC
(In reply to Jesse Barnes from comment #12)
> Can you file a separate bug for the corruption issue?  Do both of these
> issues still happen with current code?

Not anymore, no.
Comment 14 Jesse Barnes 2015-04-02 20:53:09 UTC
Great, thanks for verifying.


Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.