(In reply to Krzysztof A. Sobiecki from comment #0)
> Created attachment 117384 [details] [review] [review]
> A patch?
> 
> LLVM 3.8(svn): llvm-config-3.8 output for "--version" have "svn" in it, but
> shared library filename doesn't have it. For reasons?

Thank you, with your patch I can build mesa again with llvm 3.8.

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91456

*** Bug 91456 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Please send the patch to mesa-dev (ideally using git send-email). It'll get wider exposure there.

Please note that autotools buils have the "svn" part in the libname.
I don't knows if it will be deprecated in 3.8 and remove later or if it will be removed in 3.8.

(In reply to Serge Martin from comment #4)
> Please note that autotools buils have the "svn" part in the libname.
> I don't knows if it will be deprecated in 3.8 and remove later or if it will
> be removed in 3.8.

I use packages from:
deb http://llvm.org/apt/unstable/ llvm-toolchain main
And it have a wonderful patch called:
strip-svn.diff
Guess what it does...

(In reply to Emil Velikov from comment #3)
> Please send the patch to mesa-dev (ideally using git send-email). It'll get
> wider exposure there.

I don't see how It would be appropriate to even try to include it into a main tree, so no.

(In reply to Krzysztof A. Sobiecki from comment #6)
> (In reply to Emil Velikov from comment #3)
> > Please send the patch to mesa-dev (ideally using git send-email). It'll get
> > wider exposure there.
> 
> I don't see how It would be appropriate to even try to include it into a
> main tree, so no.
Had not idea that the llvm builds are inconsistent (again). So yes, with that into account I fully agree that we shouldn't apply until llvm is sorted.

I was trying to contact maintainer of http://llvm.org/apt/unstable/, now I will fill a bug on llvms bugzilla.

So I have filled a bug with LLVM: https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24333

Packages on llvm.org/apt should be fixed now, no need for a patch.