Bug 92476 - [cts] ES2-CTS.gtf.GL2ExtensionTests.egl_image.egl_image fails
Summary: [cts] ES2-CTS.gtf.GL2ExtensionTests.egl_image.egl_image fails
Alias: None
Product: Mesa
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Drivers/DRI/i965 (show other bugs)
Version: git
Hardware: All All
: highest normal
Assignee: Ian Romanick
QA Contact: Intel 3D Bugs Mailing List
Depends on:
Reported: 2015-10-15 18:42 UTC by Ian Romanick
Modified: 2015-11-02 17:28 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
i915 platform:
i915 features:


Description Ian Romanick 2015-10-15 18:42:26 UTC
Recent versions of the GLES3 conformance test suite fail this test.

    #beginTestCaseResult ES2-CTS.gtf.GL2ExtensionTests.egl_image.egl_image
    <?xml version="1.0"?>
    <TestCaseResult Version="0.3.2" CasePath="ES2-CTS.gtf.GL2ExtensionTests.egl_image.egl_image" CaseType="SelfValidate">
     <Text>GTFExtensionTestEGLImageApply::Apply/error: GL error produced in checkpoint 1</Text>
     <Text>GTFRunTest: FAIL</Text>
     <Text>0 passes, 1 failures, test case FAILED!</Text>
     <Result StatusCode="Fail">Fail</Result>


This test used to pass, but... I re-ran this test on Mesa 10.3 on BDW.  This is the configuration that was used for the BDW conformance submission.  The test failed.  I reverted to an older version of the CTS, and re-ran 10.3 on BDW.  The test passes, but the same "GL error produced in checkpoint 1" message is produced.

It seems this test may have always failed, but the test suite wasn't smart enough to notice.  For that reason, I am not marking this as a regression.
Comment 1 Ian Romanick 2015-10-15 18:44:19 UTC
Mark: Do any of the CI system fail this test?  I didn't see an existing bug for it.
Comment 2 Ian Romanick 2015-10-15 19:08:17 UTC
Partially trimmed backtrace.

#0  _mesa_error (ctx=0x7ffff7fa3040, error=1282, 
    fmtString=0x7ffff3b8b1e8 "glEGLImageTargetRenderbufferStorage(unsupported image format") at main/errors.c:1471
#1  0x00007ffff3a24bf3 in intel_image_target_renderbuffer_storage (
    ctx=0x7ffff7fa3040, rb=0x13f5730, image_handle=0x13500b0)
    at intel_fbo.c:353
#2  0x00007ffff35f0402 in _mesa_EGLImageTargetRenderbufferStorageOES (
    target=36161, image=0x13500b0) at main/fbobject.c:2214
#3  0x0000000000b0b0c3 in RunRenderbufferTest (pTestEGLImage=0x138c7c0, 
    windowWidth=64, windowHeight=64, 
    glEGLImageTargetTexture2DOES=0x7ffff49579a0 <shared_dispatch_stub_1276>, 
    glEGLImageTargetRenderbufferStorageOES=0x7ffff4957980 <shared_dispatch_stub_1275>, image=0x13500b0, format=6408, type=5121)
    at /home/idr/devel/graphics/ESCTS-
#4  0x0000000000b0c915 in GTFExtensionTestEGLImageApply (
    at /home/idr/devel/graphics/ESCTS-
#5  0x00000000009f3a47 in GTFTestExtensionApply (pTestExtension=0x1355df0)
    at /home/idr/devel/graphics/ESCTS-
Comment 4 Mark Janes 2015-10-15 20:31:37 UTC
This test also passes on 11.0 and 10.6 branches, eg:

Comment 5 Ian Romanick 2015-10-15 20:58:13 UTC
Hmm... I wonder if non-GBM vs GBM is the difference.  Weird.
Comment 6 Ian Romanick 2015-10-15 21:03:32 UTC
Patch sent to mesa-dev for review:

Comment 7 Ian Romanick 2015-11-02 17:28:06 UTC
Fixed by the following commit.  This commit should be included in Mesa 11.0.5.

commit 7070c8879adff2a1204d7473f119d8194eff919b
Author: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
Date:   Thu Oct 15 12:50:12 2015 -0700

    i965: Fix is-renderable check in intel_image_target_renderbuffer_storage
    Previously we could create a renderbuffer with format
    MESA_FORMAT_R8G8B8A8_UNORM, convert that renderbuffer to an EGLImage,
    then FAIL to convert the EGLImage back to a renderbuffer because
    reasons.  Just use the same check in
    intel_image_target_renderbuffer_storage that brw_render_target_supported
    There are more checks in brw_render_target_supported, but I don't think
    they are necessary here.  A different approach would be to refactor
    brw_render_target_supported to take rb->Format and rb->NumSamples as
    parameters (instead of a gl_renderbuffer) and use the new function here.
    Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@intel.com>
    Reviewed-by: Anuj Phogat <anuj.phogat@gmail.com>
    Tested-by: Tapani Pälli <tapani.palli@intel.com>
    Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92476
    Cc: "10.3 10.4 10.5 10.6 11.0" <mesa-stable@lists.freedesktop.org>

Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.