Created attachment 127020 [details] [review] Fix double printing function name in _dbus_verbose() messages.
Comment on attachment 127020 [details] [review] Fix double printing function name in _dbus_verbose() messages. Review of attachment 127020 [details] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- Fine, except that you're introducing verbose logging that wasn't previously there. ::: dbus/dbus-transport.c @@ +1145,4 @@ > { > DBusDispatchStatus status; > > + _dbus_verbose ("enter\n"); This was previously #if 0. I suspect this may have been because this function is frequently called, so it was so ridiculously verbose that it makes DBUS_VERBOSE even less useful than it already is?
(In reply to Simon McVittie from comment #2) > Comment on attachment 127020 [details] [review] [review] > Fix double printing function name in _dbus_verbose() messages. > > Review of attachment 127020 [details] [review] [review]: > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Fine, except that you're introducing verbose logging that wasn't previously > there. > > ::: dbus/dbus-transport.c > @@ +1145,4 @@ > > { > > DBusDispatchStatus status; > > > > + _dbus_verbose ("enter\n"); > > This was previously #if 0. I suspect this may have been because this > function is frequently called, so it was so ridiculously verbose that it > makes DBUS_VERBOSE even less useful than it already is? Okay, I will wrap this hunk with #if 0 ...#endif, so that people want to debug cant change that.
Created attachment 127022 [details] [review] Fix double printing function name in _dbus_verbose() messages. Bug:
Attachment 127022 [details] pushed as 487a26f - Fix double printing function name in _dbus_verbose() messages.
Use of freedesktop.org services, including Bugzilla, is subject to our Code of Conduct. How we collect and use information is described in our Privacy Policy.