I originally reported this issue on the Linux kernel Bugzilla, see https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153241
But it seems udisks is the cause of the problem; see comment 1: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153241#c1
The bug report text from there is below with some minor edits. See also:
With a recent kernel update (on Lubuntu 16.04 x64-64), I noticed some error messages in the log on connecting a USB hard drive, for example:
[ 1580.500043] usb 2-1: new high-speed USB device number 4 using ehci-pci
[ 1580.633247] usb 2-1: New USB device found, idVendor=0bc2, idProduct=3300
[ 1580.633255] usb 2-1: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2, SerialNumber=3
[ 1580.633260] usb 2-1: Product: Desktop
[ 1580.633264] usb 2-1: Manufacturer: Seagate
[ 1580.633268] usb 2-1: SerialNumber: [redacted]
[ 1580.672701] usb-storage 2-1:1.0: USB Mass Storage device detected
[ 1580.674539] scsi host5: usb-storage 2-1:1.0
[ 1580.674639] usbcore: registered new interface driver usb-storage
[ 1580.676522] usbcore: registered new interface driver uas
[ 1581.673205] scsi 5:0:0:0: Direct-Access Seagate Desktop 0146 PQ: 0 ANSI: 4
[ 1581.676331] sd 5:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg2 type 0
[ 1581.677416] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdb] 732566644 4096-byte logical blocks: (3.00 TB/2.73 TiB)
[ 1581.677907] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdb] Write Protect is off
[ 1581.677918] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdb] Mode Sense: 1c 00 00 00
[ 1581.678407] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdb] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA
[ 1581.690549] sdb: sdb1
[ 1581.692636] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdb] Attached SCSI disk
[ 1581.846416] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdb] tag#0 FAILED Result: hostbyte=DID_ERROR driverbyte=DRIVER_SENSE
[ 1581.846426] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdb] tag#0 Sense Key : Hardware Error [current] [descriptor]
[ 1581.846432] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdb] tag#0 Add. Sense: No additional sense information
[ 1581.846439] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdb] tag#0 CDB: ATA command pass through(16) 85 06 20 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 e5 00
[ 1581.929398] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdb] tag#0 FAILED Result: hostbyte=DID_ERROR driverbyte=DRIVER_SENSE
[ 1581.929403] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdb] tag#0 Sense Key : Hardware Error [current] [descriptor]
[ 1581.929405] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdb] tag#0 Add. Sense: No additional sense information
[ 1581.929409] sd 5:0:0:0: [sdb] tag#0 CDB: ATA command pass through(12)/Blank a1 06 20 da 00 00 4f c2 00 b0 00 00
The ATA pass-through commands are attempted every ten minutes, so the tag#0... lines repeat in the kernel log. The commands are something to do with SMART.
It seems other people are seeing this problem too:
"kernel-4.6.3-300 shows false warnings about USB hard disks."
"Worrisome USB disk messages in 4.6.0-1, but not 4.5.0-2"
I bisected between 4.4.13 and 4.4.14 with this result:
$ git bisect bad
0dec8c0d67c64401d97122e4eba347ccc5850622 is the first bad commit
Author: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Date: Fri May 13 12:04:06 2016 -0700
scsi_lib: correctly retry failed zero length REQ_TYPE_FS commands
commit a621bac3044ed6f7ec5fa0326491b2d4838bfa93 upstream.
When SCSI was written, all commands coming from the filesystem
(REQ_TYPE_FS commands) had data. This meant that our signal for needing
to complete the command was the number of bytes completed being equal to
the number of bytes in the request. Unfortunately, with the advent of
flush barriers, we can now get zero length REQ_TYPE_FS commands, which
confuse this logic because they satisfy the condition every time. This
means they never get retried even for retryable conditions, like UNIT
ATTENTION because we complete them early assuming they're done. Fix
this by special casing the early completion condition to recognise zero
length commands with errors and let them drop through to the retry code.
Reported-by: Sebastian Parschauer <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Signed-off-by: James E.J. Bottomley <email@example.com>
Tested-by: Jack Wang <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <email@example.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From that commit description, it sounds like it may not be the real/root cause of the problem. Just that now, commands which might have been silently dropped/ignored before, no longer are.
If udisksd unconditionally tries to issue ATA pass-through commands (opcodes 0x85 and 0xA1), that could be problematic for several reasons:
- The FAILED log messages are likely to make the user think their drive is defective. Perhaps the majority of USB hard drives (well, USB-to-IDE/SATA bridges) don't support ATA pass-through. And things like SD/MMC cards, USB card readers or flash drives definitely won't.
- Over time the log gets filled up with repeated messages as the ATA pass-through commands are issued every ten minutes. If the first attempt fails, don't keep trying to avoid spamming the log and giving users heart attacks thinking their disks are about to die. :)
Perhaps print some explanation, e.g. "target probably does not support ATA pass-through commands".
- Knowing the state of drive/bridge firmware:
- some devices could hang or lock up on receiving the unknown commands, perhaps requiring power cycling to recover
- some devices could corrupt data being read or written when receiving the unknown commands
- some devices could even be "bricked" on receiving the commands, if 0x85 or 0xA1 opcodes have some vendor-specific function
- Is there any way to blacklist a given device, e.g. by USB ID, so no SMART/ATA pass-through commands are issued? Though that wouldn't work for native SCSI drives. To avoid potential problems, I'd suggest having a whitelist for devices which do support ATA pass-through.
Confirming the issue propagated on Debian Stable (kernel 3.16.0-4-amd64), Kubuntu 14.04.5 (kernel 4.4 series) and 16.04 (kernel 4.6 series).
If indeed a kernel patch is responsible for this issue in udisks2, it has probably been backported and spreaded to all these kernels and distros.
So far has been just an annoying bug, but I'm seriously worried that it may mask real hardware issues when they'll happen.
Is there anything besides time, that is needed to get this bug addressed?